Complementary chemometrics and deep learning for semantic segmentation of tall and wide visible and near-infrared spectral images of plants

Close range spectra imaging of agricultural plants is widely performed to support digital plant phenotyping, a task where physicochemical changes in plants are monitored in a non-destructive way. A major step before analyzing the spectral images of plants is to distinguish the plant from the background. Usually, this is an easy task and can be performed using mathematical operations on the combinations of selected spectral bands, such as estimating the normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI). However, when the background of plants contains objects with similar spectral properties as plant then the segmentation based on the threshold of NDVI images can suffer. Another common approach is to train pixel classifiers on spectra extracted from selected locations in the spectral image, but such an approach does not take the spatial information about the plant structure into account. From a technical perspective, plant spectral imaging for digital phenotyping applications usually involves imaging several plants together for a comparative purpose, hence, the imaging scene is relatively big in terms of memory. To solve the challenge of plant segmentation and handling the memory challenge, this study proposes a novel approach, which combines chemometrics with advanced deep learning (DL) based semantic segmentation. The approach has four key steps. As a first step, the spectral image is pre-processed to reduce illumination effects present in the close-range spectral images of plants resulting from the interaction of light with complex plant geometry. Different chemometric pre-processing methods were explored to find possible improvements in the segmentation performance of the DL model. The second step was to perform a principal components analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of the images, thus drastically reducing their size so that they can be handled more easily using the available computer memory during the training of the DL model. As the third step, small random images (128 × 128) were subsampled from the tall and wide image matrices to generate the training and validation sets for training the DL models. In the last step, a U-net based deep semantic segmentation model was trained and validated on the sub-sampled spectral images. The results showed that the proposed approach allowed efficient handling and training of the DL segmentation model. The intersection over union (IoU) scores for the segmentation was 0.96 for the independent test set image. The segmentation based on variable sorting for normalization and standard normal variate pre-processed data achieved the highest IoU scores. A combination of chemometrics and DL led to an efficient segmentation of tall and wide spectral images which otherwise would have given out-of-memory errors. The developed method can facilitate digital phenotyping tasks where close-range spectral imaging is used to estimate the physicochemical properties of plants. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: puneet.mishra@wur.nl (P. Mishra).

[1]  Colm P. O'Donnell,et al.  Terahertz time domain spectroscopy and imaging: Emerging techniques for food process monitoring and quality control , 2012 .

[2]  Alison Nordon,et al.  Early Detection Of Drought Stress in Arabidopsis Thaliana Utilsing a Portable Hyperspectral Imaging Setup , 2019, 2019 10th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[3]  Ming Chen,et al.  Data-mining Techniques for Image-based Plant Phenotypic Traits Identification and Classification , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Colm P. O'Donnell,et al.  Hyperspectral imaging – an emerging process analytical tool for food quality and safety control , 2007 .

[5]  P. Mishra,et al.  Close Range Spectral Imaging for Disease Detection in Plants Using Autonomous Platforms: a Review on Recent Studies , 2020, Current Robotics Reports.

[6]  Beata Walczak,et al.  VSN: Variable sorting for normalization , 2020 .

[7]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Close range hyperspectral imaging of plants: A review , 2017 .

[8]  R. Barnes,et al.  Standard Normal Variate Transformation and De-Trending of Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectra , 1989 .

[9]  José Manuel Amigo,et al.  HYPER-Tools. A graphical user-friendly interface for hyperspectral image analysis , 2018 .

[10]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  Review: New sensors and data-driven approaches—A path to next generation phenomics☆ , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[11]  Gerrit Polder,et al.  The hype in spectral imaging , 2020, Spectroscopy Europe.

[12]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[13]  Santosh Lohumi,et al.  Close-range hyperspectral imaging of whole plants for digital phenotyping: Recent applications and illumination correction approaches , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[14]  Nicolas Audebert,et al.  Deep Learning for Classification of Hyperspectral Data: A Comparative Review , 2019, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[15]  Yufeng Ge,et al.  High-throughput analysis of leaf physiological and chemical traits with VIS–NIR–SWIR spectroscopy: a case study with a maize diversity panel , 2019, Plant Methods.

[16]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[17]  Francesco Cellini,et al.  Drought phenotyping in Vitis vinifera using RGB and NIR imaging , 2019, Scientia Horticulturae.

[18]  Yufeng Ge,et al.  High Throughput In vivo Analysis of Plant Leaf Chemical Properties Using Hyperspectral Imaging , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[19]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Analysis of hyperspectral images for detection of drought stress and recovery in maize plants in a high-throughput phenotyping platform , 2019, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[20]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimation of Plant and Canopy Architectural Traits Using the Digital Plant Phenotyping Platform1[OPEN] , 2019, Plant Physiology.

[21]  Douglas N. Rutledge,et al.  MBA-GUI: A chemometric graphical user interface for multi-block data visualisation, regression, classification, variable selection and automated pre-processing , 2020, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems.

[22]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[23]  José García Rodríguez,et al.  A survey on deep learning techniques for image and video semantic segmentation , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[24]  Wolfram Mauser,et al.  Spaceborne Imaging Spectroscopy for Sustainable Agriculture: Contributions and Challenges , 2018, Surveys in Geophysics.

[25]  Y. Ge,et al.  Application of high-throughput plant phenotyping for assessing biophysical traits and drought response in two oak species under controlled environment , 2020 .

[26]  Gerrit Polder,et al.  Potato Virus Y Detection in Seed Potatoes Using Deep Learning on Hyperspectral Images , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[27]  Yongguang Hu,et al.  X‐ray computed tomography for quality inspection of agricultural products: A review , 2019, Food science & nutrition.

[28]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimation of Plant and Canopy Architectural Traits Using the Digital Plant Phenotyping Platform1  [OPEN]. , 2019, Plant physiology.

[29]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[30]  Douglas N. Rutledge,et al.  Utilising variable sorting for normalisation to correct illumination effects in close-range spectral images of potato plants , 2020 .

[31]  F. Loreto,et al.  Plant Phenotyping Research Trends, a Science Mapping Approach , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[32]  Iasonas Kokkinos,et al.  DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[33]  U. Schurr,et al.  Plant Phenotyping: Past, Present, and Future , 2019, Plant phenomics.

[34]  S. Kinast,et al.  Ground-level hyperspectral imagery for detecting weeds in wheat fields , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[35]  L. Xiong,et al.  Crop Phenomics and High-throughput Phenotyping: Past Decades, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. , 2020, Molecular plant.

[36]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Close-range hyperspectral image analysis for the early detection of stress responses in individual plants in a high-throughput phenotyping platform , 2018 .

[37]  Chris Brien,et al.  The Development of Hyperspectral Distribution Maps to Predict the Content and Distribution of Nitrogen and Water in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[38]  Mercedes Eugenia Paoletti,et al.  Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review , 2019 .

[39]  Alison Nordon,et al.  Homogenising and Segmenting Hyperspectral Images of Plants and Testing Chemicals in a High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping Setup , 2019, 2019 10th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[40]  Kadan Aljoumaa,et al.  A comparative dimensionality reduction study in telecom customer segmentation using deep learning and PCA , 2020, Journal of Big Data.

[41]  F. Baret,et al.  PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra , 1990 .

[42]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2003, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[43]  J. Féret,et al.  A physically-based model for retrieving foliar biochemistry and leaf orientation using close-range imaging spectroscopy , 2016 .

[44]  F. Boissieu,et al.  PROSPECT-PRO for estimating content of nitrogen-containing leaf proteins and other carbon-based constituents , 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment.