Task complexity, vertical display and user interaction in aggregated search

Aggregated search is the task of blending results from specialized search services or verticals into the Web search results. While many studies have focused on aggregated search techniques, few studies have tried to better understand how users interact with aggregated search results. This study investigates how task complexity and vertical display (the blending of vertical results into the web results) affect the use of vertical content. Twenty-nine subjects completed six search tasks of varying levels of task complexity using two aggregated search interfaces: one that blended vertical results into the web results and one that only provided indirect vertical access. Our results show that more complex tasks required significantly more interaction and that subjects completing these tasks examined more vertical results. While the amount of interaction was the same between interfaces, subjects clicked on more vertical results when these were blended into the web results. Our results also show an interaction between task complexity and vertical display; subjects clicked on more verticals when completing the more complex tasks with the interface that blended vertical results. Subjects' evaluations of the two interfaces were nearly identical, but when analyzed with respect to their interface preferences, we found a positive relationship between system evaluations and individual preferences. Subjects justified their preference using similar rationales and their comments illustrate how the display itself can influence judgments of information quality, especially in cases when the vertical results might not be relevant to the search task.

[1]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[2]  Tapas Kanungo,et al.  On composition of a federated web search result page: using online users to provide pairwise preference for heterogeneous verticals , 2011, WSDM '11.

[3]  Xiao Li,et al.  Learning query intent from regularized click graphs , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[4]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Learning to aggregate vertical results into web search results , 2011, CIKM '11.

[5]  J. Hackman,et al.  Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[6]  R E Wood,et al.  Impact of guided exploration and enactive exploration on self-regulatory mechanisms and information acquisition through electronic search. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Vertical selection in the presence of unlabeled verticals , 2010, SIGIR '10.

[8]  JärvelinKalervo,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[9]  Ben Carterette,et al.  An Analysis of Assessor Behavior in Crowdsourced Preference Judgments , 2010 .

[10]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Sources of evidence for vertical selection , 2009, SIGIR.

[11]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Robert Villa,et al.  Factors affecting click-through behavior in aggregated search interfaces , 2010, CIKM.

[14]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  A Methodology for Evaluating Aggregated Search Results , 2011, ECIR.

[15]  Elaine Toms Task-based information searching and retrieval , 2011, Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval.

[16]  Heather L. O'Brien,et al.  The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[17]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Interactive Information Seeking Behaviour and Retrieval , 2011 .

[19]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[21]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior , 2010 .

[22]  Jeonghyun Kim,et al.  Task difficulty as a predictor and indicator of web searching interaction , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  A Task-Based Evaluation of an Aggregated Search Interface , 2009, SPIRE.

[24]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Search behaviors in different task types , 2010, JCDL '10.

[25]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[26]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[27]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Integration of news content into web results , 2009, WSDM '09.

[28]  Yuelin Li,et al.  Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Searcher's Assessments of Task Complexity for Web Searching , 2004, ECIR.

[31]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Michael A. Shepherd,et al.  A Field Study Characterizing Web-based Information Seeking Tasks , 2022 .