The Dynamics of Boundary Objects, Social Infrastructures and Social Identities

Abstract This paper takes a dynamic approach to understanding the nature and role of boundary objects by examining them in relation to the social infrastructures within which they are embedded and to the social identities of the groups that share them. It explores the premise that boundary objects are used not only as a translation device, but also as a resource to form and express social identities. It further suggests the occurrence of a dynamic process whereby changes in boundary objects enable changes in social infrastructures and social identities in one group. These changes, in turn, create the conditions for change in bordering groups through shared boundary objects. Based on interviews which were conducted over three years, we illustrate these ideas by presenting three vignettes that describe the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the AEC industry and the changes that consequently occurred. Keywords: Boundary Objects, Social Infrastructures, Social Identities, Organisational Change.

[1]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[2]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[3]  C. Calhoun Social theory and the politics of identity , 1994 .

[4]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  The Role of Material Objects in the Design Process: A Comparison of Two Design Cultures and How They Contend with Automation , 1998 .

[5]  R. Badham,et al.  The Politics of Socio-technical Intervention: An Interactionist View , 2000 .

[6]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[7]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Questions of Cultural Identity , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment , 2000 .

[11]  Elaine K. Yakura,et al.  Charting Time: Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects , 2002 .

[12]  Margaret R. Somers,et al.  Reclaiming the Epistemological Other: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity , 1993 .

[13]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[14]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Organizational memory: processes, boundary objects, and trajectories , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[15]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[16]  D. Skinner,et al.  Valuing Technology: Organisations, Culture and Change , 1999 .

[17]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[20]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  John C. Turner,et al.  Is Limited Information Processing Capacity the Cause of Social Stereotyping , 1990 .

[22]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing , 2001 .

[24]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .