Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes

Abstract. We examined the linkage between climate and interspecific plant interactions in New England salt marshes. Because harsh edaphic conditions in marshes can be ameliorated by neighboring plants, plant neighbors can have net competitive or facilitative interactions, depending on ambient physical stresses. In particular, high soil salinities, which are largely controlled by solar radiation and the evaporation of marsh porewater, can be ameliorated by plant neighbors under stressful conditions leading to facilitative interactions. Under less stressful edaphic conditions, these same neighbors may be competitors. In this paper, we use this mechanistic understanding of marsh plant interactions to examine the hypothesis that latitudinal and inter-annual variation in climate can influence the nature and strength of marsh plant species interactions. We quantified the relationship between climate and species interactions by transplanting marsh plants into ambient vegetation and unvegetated bare patches at sites north and south of Cape Cod, a major biogeographic barrier on the east coast of North America. We hypothesized that the cooler climate north of Cape Cod would lead to fewer positive interactions among marsh plants. We found both latitudinal and inter-annual variation in the neighbor relations of marsh plants that paralleled latitudinal differences in temperature and salinity. South of Cape Cod, plant neighbor interactions tended to be more facilitative, whereas north of Cape Cod, plant neighbor interactions were more competitive. At all sites, soil salinity increased and plant neighbor interactions were more facilitative in warmer versus cooler years. Our results show that interspecific interactions can be strikingly linked to climate, but also reveal that because the sensitivity of specific species interactions to climatic variation is highly variable, predicting how entire communities will respond to climate change will be difficult, even in relatively simple, well-studied systems.

[1]  A. G. Fischer.  LATITUDINAL VARIATIONS IN ORGANIC DIVERSITY , 1960 .

[2]  F. E. Egler,et al.  Vegetation of the Wequetequock‐Pawcatuck Tidal‐Marshes, Connecticut , 1950 .

[3]  M. Bertness,et al.  Competition and Facilitation in Marsh Plants , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[4]  C. Holzapfel,et al.  BIDIRECTIONAL FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE BETWEEN SHRUBS AND ANNUALS IN THE MOJAVE DESERT , 1999 .

[5]  M. Bertness,et al.  Salt Tolerances and The Distribution of Fugitive Salt Marsh Plants , 1992 .

[6]  M. Bertness,et al.  Physical Stress and Positive Associations Among Marsh Plants , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Bertness,et al.  Positive interactions in communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Determinants of Pattern in a New England Salt Marsh Plant Community , 1987 .

[9]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Biotic interactions and global change. , 1993 .

[10]  G. Vermeij.  Biogeography and Adaptation: Patterns of Marine Life , 1978 .

[11]  J. Bruno,et al.  Climate-driven interactions among rocky intertidal organisms caught between a rock and a hot place , 1999, Oecologia.

[12]  M. Bertness.  The ecology of Atlantic shorelines , 1998 .

[13]  G. Leonard.  LATITUDINAL VARIATION IN SPECIES INTERACTIONS: A TEST IN THE NEW ENGLAND ROCKY INTERTIDAL ZONE , 2000 .

[14]  T. Rand.  Effects of environmental context on the susceptibility of Atriplex patula to attack by herbivorous beetles , 1999, Oecologia.

[15]  James S. Clark,et al.  Terrestrial biotic responses to environmental change and feedbacks to climate , 1996 .

[16]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[17]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[18]  M. Bertness,et al.  Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cordgrass in response to accelerated sea-level rise , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  W. Niering,et al.  Vegetation Change on a Northeast Tidal Marsh: Interaction of Sea‐Level Rise and Marsh Accretion , 1993 .

[20]  M. Bertness,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR FACTORS MAINTAINING PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY IN A NEW ENGLAND SALT MARSH , 1999 .

[21]  R. Macarthur.  Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[22]  J. Travis,et al.  The Role of Abiotic Factors in Community Organization , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[23]  M. Bertness,et al.  Trophic Consequences of a Positive Plant Interaction , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[24]  M. Bertness.  Zonation of Spartina Patens and Spartina Alterniflora in New England Salt Marsh , 1991 .

[25]  A. Ellison.  Effects of Competition, Disturbance, and Herbivory on Salicornia Europaea , 1987 .

[26]  G. King,et al.  Relation of Soil Water Movement and Sulfide Concentration to Spartina alterniflora Production in a Georgia Salt Marsh , 1982, Science.

[27]  P. Troke,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF SALT TOLERANCE IN HALOPHYTES , 1977 .

[28]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Community Organization in Temperate and Tropical Rocky Intertidal Habitats: Prey Refuges in Relation to Consumer Pressure Gradients , 1981 .

[29]  B. Menge,et al.  Community Regulation: Variation in Disturbance, Competition, and Predation in Relation to Environmental Stress and Recruitment , 1987, The American Naturalist.