The effect of thermal processing on the behaviour of peanut allergen peptide targets used in multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry experiments.

Mass spectrometry-based methods offer an alternative means of determining allergens in foods. Whilst targeted methods are likely to offer the most robust approach for detection and quantification, little is known about how food processing may affect the behaviour of peptide targets. A systematic study has been undertaken to investigate the effects of thermal processing (boiling, roasting, frying) on the behaviour of a suite of peanut peptide targets representing the major clinically-relevant allergens. Initially the effect of thermal processing on protein extractability was investigated and a mass spectrometry-compatible buffer identified comprising 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 containing 50 mM dithiothreitol and 0.04% (w/v) acid labile detergent which was able to extract 45-100% of protein from raw, boiled, roasted and fried peanuts using sonication at 60 °C. Eight peptide targets were identified including two peptides from each cupin allergen, Ara h1 and Ara h3 and four peptides from the prolamin superfamily allergens Ara h2, 6 and 7. AQUA peptide standards were synthesised and used to undertake multiple-reaction monitoring experiments, giving assay sensitivities of 0.1-30 amoles of peptide on-column (3 : 1 signal : noise), calculated limits of quantification between 96-1343 amoles of peptide on-column and a linear dynamic range of 4-5 orders of magnitude. Absolute quantification of individual peanut allergens in thermally processed samples showed that peptide targets in the cupin allergens were more prone to processing-induced effects than those from Ara h2, 6 and 7. Targets flanked by arginine residues showed greater thermostability. Identification of processing-stable targets, coupled with more efficient extraction procedures and a wide dynamic range, shows that targeted mass spectrometry methods have great potential as an additional method for quantifying peanut allergens in complex food matrices.

[1]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .

[2]  S. Dreskin,et al.  Epitope analysis of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6: characteristic patterns of IgE‐binding fingerprints among individuals with similar clinical histories , 2015, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[3]  A. Custovic,et al.  Molecular diagnosis of peanut and legume allergy , 2011, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[4]  Jerry Zweigenbaum,et al.  Discovery of highly conserved unique peanut and tree nut peptides by LC-MS/MS for multi-allergen detection. , 2016, Food chemistry.

[5]  Matthew Demas,et al.  Structural and Immunologic Characterization of Ara h 1, a Major Peanut Allergen* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Jonathan DeVries,et al.  Multi-allergen Quantitation and the Impact of Thermal Treatment in Industry-Processed Baked Goods by ELISA and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. , 2015, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[7]  A. Burks,et al.  Molecular cloning and epitope analysis of the peanut allergen Ara h 3. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  R. Pieters,et al.  Comparison of six commercial ELISA kits for their specificity and sensitivity in detecting different major peanut allergens. , 2015, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[9]  Craig Lawless,et al.  CONSeQuence: Prediction of Reference Peptides for Absolute Quantitative Proteomics Using Consensus Machine Learning Approaches* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[10]  Steve L Taylor,et al.  Factors affecting the determination of threshold doses for allergenic foods: how much is too much? , 2002, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[11]  S. Hubbard,et al.  Prediction of missed proteolytic cleavages for the selection of surrogate peptides for quantitative proteomics. , 2012, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[12]  A. Howard,et al.  Crystal structure of Ara h 3, a major allergen in peanut. , 2009, Molecular immunology.

[13]  N. Rigby,et al.  Boiling peanut Ara h 1 results in the formation of aggregates with reduced allergenicity. , 2011, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[14]  N. Rigby,et al.  Effect of Heating and Glycation on the Allergenicity of 2S Albumins (Ara h 2/6) from Peanut , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  J. Callahan,et al.  Global proteomic screening of protein allergens and advanced glycation endproducts in thermally processed peanuts. , 2013, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[16]  A. Burks,et al.  Biochemical and Structural Analysis of the IgE Binding Sites on Ara h1, an Abundant and Highly Allergenic Peanut Protein* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Thomas Jacks,et al.  The major peanut allergen, Ara h 2, functions as a trypsin inhibitor, and roasting enhances this function. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[18]  M. Schlaak,et al.  Selective Cloning of Peanut Allergens, Including Profilin and 2S Albumins, by Phage Display Technology , 1999, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[19]  D. Campbell,et al.  Loss of allergenic proteins during boiling explains tolerance to boiled peanut in peanut allergy. , 2014, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[20]  M. Gaspari,et al.  Proteolytic processing of the peanut allergen Ara h 3. , 2005, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[21]  M. Mann,et al.  Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis , 2009, Nature Methods.

[22]  Conrad Bessant,et al.  Current perspectives and recommendations for the development of mass spectrometry methods for the determination of allergens in foods. , 2011, Journal of AOAC International.

[23]  R. Van Ree,et al.  How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens. , 2015, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[24]  F. Al-Taher,et al.  Increasing extractability of protein for allergen detection after food processing , 2011 .

[25]  Steve L. Taylor,et al.  Threshold dose for peanut: risk characterization based upon published results from challenges of peanut-allergic individuals. , 2009, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[26]  G. Roberts,et al.  Precautionary allergen labelling: perspectives from key stakeholder groups , 2015, Allergy.

[27]  P. Ferranti,et al.  Analysis of food proteins and peptides by mass spectrometry-based techniques. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[28]  J. B. Misra Variation in Nitrogen-to-Protein Conversion Factor for Peanut , 2001 .

[29]  Alain Maquet,et al.  Current Challenges in Detecting Food Allergens by Shotgun and Targeted Proteomic Approaches: A Case Study on Traces of Peanut Allergens in Baked Cookies , 2012, Nutrients.

[30]  L. Elviri,et al.  Use of specific peptide biomarkers for quantitative confirmation of hidden allergenic peanut proteins Ara h 2 and Ara h 3/4 for food control by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[31]  R. Helm,et al.  Peanut Protein Allergens: The Effect of Roasting on Solubility and Allergenicity , 2005, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[32]  A. Woodcock,et al.  Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics. , 2010, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[33]  H. Peeters,et al.  Human Plasma Glycome in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorders* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  H. Gruppen,et al.  Legumin allergens from peanuts and soybeans: effects of denaturation and aggregation on allergenicity. , 2008, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[35]  Steve L. Taylor,et al.  Survey of peanut levels in selected Irish food products bearing peanut allergen advisory labels , 2013, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[36]  David Sheffield,et al.  Threshold dose for peanut: Risk characterization based upon diagnostic oral challenge of a series of 286 peanut-allergic individuals. , 2010, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[37]  M. Walden,et al.  Analytical procedures for quantification of peptides in pharmaceutical research by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[38]  L. Deterding,et al.  Identification of Maillard reaction products on peanut allergens that influence binding to the receptor for advanced glycation end products , 2013, Allergy.

[39]  Deepak R. Mani,et al.  Statistical characterization of multiple-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) assays for quantitative proteomics , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  T. Whitaker,et al.  Effect of processing on recovery and variability associated with immunochemical analytical methods for multiple allergens in a single matrix: sugar cookies. , 2012, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[41]  Hubert Chassaigne,et al.  Proteomics-based approach to detect and identify major allergens in processed peanuts by capillary LC-Q-TOF (MS/MS). , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[42]  Tong-Jen Fu,et al.  Impact of thermal processing on ELISA detection of peanut allergens. , 2013, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[43]  J. Wal,et al.  Trypsin resistance of the major peanut allergen Ara h 6 and allergenicity of the digestion products are abolished after selective disruption of disulfide bonds. , 2012, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[44]  Adnan Custovic,et al.  Quantification of specific IgE to whole peanut extract and peanut components in prediction of peanut allergy. , 2011, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[45]  B. Mikami,et al.  Crystal structure of the major peanut allergen Ara h 1. , 2011, Molecular immunology.

[46]  Paul J. Turner,et al.  Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: An analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992-2012 , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[47]  Maria Careri,et al.  Particle-packed column versus silica-based monolithic column for liquid chromatography-electrospray-linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry multiallergen trace analysis in foods. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[48]  Anuradha Balasundaram,et al.  Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Peanut Allergens in Food Ingredients Used for Oral Food Challenges. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[49]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem Lys-C/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[50]  B. Higgins,et al.  Time trends in the prevalence of peanut allergy: three cohorts of children from the same geographical location in the UK , 2010, Allergy.

[51]  A. Sheikh,et al.  The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2014, Allergy.

[52]  J. Heick,et al.  First screening method for the simultaneous detection of seven allergens by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[53]  M. Gowland,et al.  Further fatal allergic reactions to food in the United Kingdom, 1999-2006. , 2007, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[54]  Maria Careri,et al.  Determination of peanut allergens in cereal-chocolate-based snacks: metal-tag inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry immunoassay versus liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. , 2008, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[55]  J. Callahan,et al.  Confirmation of peanut protein using peptide markers in dark chocolate using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[56]  E. Anklam,et al.  Effect of roasting history and buffer composition on peanut protein extraction efficiency. , 2004, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[57]  Amy-Joan L Ham,et al.  Sample preparation and digestion for proteomic analyses using spin filters , 2005, Proteomics.

[58]  Maria Careri,et al.  A Rapid Size-Exclusion Solid-Phase Extraction Step for Enhanced Sensitivity in Multi-Allergen Determination in Dark Chocolate and Biscuits by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry , 2013, Food Analytical Methods.