Quantifying the interactions between allo- and egocentric representations of space.

Under many circumstances, humans do not judge the location of objects in space where they really are. For instance, when a background is added to a target object, the judged position of a target with respect to oneself (egocentric position) is shifted in the opposite direction as the placement of such a background with respect to the body midline. It is an ongoing debate whether such effects are due to a uni- or bi-directional interaction between allo- and egocentric spatial representations in the brain, or reflect a response strategy, known as the perceived midline shift. In this study, the effects of allocentric stimulus coordinates on perceived egocentric position were examined more precisely and in a quantitative manner. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the judged allocentric position (with respect to a background) is also influenced by the egocentric position in space of that object. Allo- and egocentric coordinates were varied independently. Also, the effect of background luminance on the observed interactions between spatial coordinates was determined. Since background luminance had an effect on the size of the interaction between allocentric stimulus coordinates and egocentric judgments, and no reverse interaction was found, it seems that interactions between ego- and allocentric reference frames is most likely only unidirectional, with the latter affecting the former. This interaction effect was described in a quantitative manner.

[1]  R. Andersen,et al.  Eye-centered, head-centered, and intermediate coding of remembered sound locations in area LIP. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead? , 2002, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Andersen,et al.  Models of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Which Perform Multimodal Integration and Represent Space in Several Coordinate Frames , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Defining the cortical visual systems: "what", "where", and "how". , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[5]  F. Previc,et al.  Why your "head is in the clouds" during thinking: the relationship between cognition and upper space. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Modest gaze-related discharge modulation in monkey dorsal premotor cortex during a reaching task performed with free fixation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Cerebral cortical mechanisms of reaching movements. , 1992, Science.

[8]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[9]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Andersen Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  B. Stein,et al.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D P Carey,et al.  Eye–hand coordination: Eye to hand or hand to eye? , 2000, Current Biology.

[14]  Leonard Brosgole,et al.  An analysis of induced motion , 1968 .

[15]  E. Rolls,et al.  Spatial view cells in the primate hippocampus: allocentric view not head direction or eye position or place. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  E. Rolls Spatial view cells and the representation of place in the primate hippocampus , 1999, Hippocampus.

[17]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R. Andersen,et al.  Head position signals used by parietal neurons to encode locations of visual stimuli , 1995, Nature.

[19]  J. O’Keefe Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat , 1976, Experimental Neurology.

[20]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[21]  B. Stein,et al.  Spatial factors determine the activity of multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus , 1986, Brain Research.

[22]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  A. Berthoz,et al.  The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: a functional magnetic resonance study , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Selection-for-action in visual search. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Albert Postma,et al.  Egocentric and Exocentric Spatial Judgements of Visual Displacement , 1999 .