Rooting patterns and fine root biomass of Pinus pinaster assessed by trench wall and core methods

Variability of fine root (diameter < 2 mm) distribution was investigated in four 55 to 56-year-old Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) stands using a combination of trench wall observations and destructive sampling. Our objectives were to assess patterns of fine root distribution, to estimate tree fine root biomass and to explore interactions with understorey vegetation in a gradient of relevant site conditions. Results showed that root density decreased with soil depth in all stands, and variability appeared to be highest in litter and subsoil layers especially where compacted soil layers occurred. Roots were clustered in patches in the top 0–50 cm of the soil or were present as root channels at greater depths. Cluster number, cluster size and number of root channels were comparable in all four stands. Overall fine root biomass at depths of 0–120 cm ranged from 2.7 to 7.2 Mg ha−1 and was highest for the two driest stands. The use of trench wall records made it possible to reduce the variability of these estimates. Understorey species represented as much as 90% of the total number of fine roots in the upper layers, and the understorey formed a considerable proportion of the total ecosystem biomass, suggesting that understorey species are likely competitors for nutrients in this ecosystem. Further studies should focus on the interaction of the understorey and pine roots and the ecological significance of clustered roots and nutrient distributions.

[1]  S. A. Barber.  Solute movement in the soil–root system , 1978, Nature.

[2]  R. Sands,et al.  Effects of compaction and simulated root channels in the subsoil on root development, water uptake and growth of radiata pine. , 1992, Tree physiology.

[3]  M. Bakker,et al.  Fine root distribution of trees and understory in mature stands of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) on dry and humid sites , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[4]  D. Coomes,et al.  IMPACTS OF ROOT COMPETITION IN FORESTS AND WOODLANDS: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND REVIEW OF EXPERIMENTS , 2000 .

[5]  P. B. Tinker,et al.  Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil , 1972, Plant and Soil.

[6]  P. Tinker,et al.  Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil , 1973, Plant and Soil.

[7]  J. Speijers,et al.  Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[8]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Estimating Root Biomass in Rocky Soils using Pits, Cores, and Allometric Equations , 2007 .

[9]  E. L. Stone,et al.  On the maximum extent of tree roots , 1991 .

[10]  M. Kazda,et al.  Clustered root distribution in mature stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies , 2005, Oecologia.

[11]  Angela Hodge,et al.  The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients , 2004 .

[12]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics , 2005 .

[13]  J. Ouden.  Mechanical resistance by an ectorganic soil layer on root development of seedling Pinus sylvestris , 1997, Plant and Soil.

[14]  P. Veldhoven,et al.  Inorganic and organic phosphate measurements in the nanomolar range. , 1987, Analytical biochemistry.

[15]  B. Clinton,et al.  Investigating the Allelopathic Potential of Kalmia latifolia L. (Ericaceae) , 2005 .

[16]  Sally E Smith and David J Read.  Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2nd ed , 1997 .

[17]  P. B. Tinker,et al.  Solute Movement in the Soil-Root System. , 1978 .

[18]  A. Bolte,et al.  Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[19]  C. Jourdan,et al.  Changes with age in the spatial distribution of roots of Eucalyptus clone in Congo: Impact on water and nutrient uptake , 2002 .

[20]  J. H. Manwaring,et al.  Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment , 1990, Nature.

[21]  L. Pagès,et al.  Sampling Strategies, Scaling, and Statistics , 2000 .

[22]  D. Robinson.  The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[23]  Richard N. Williams,et al.  Belowground ecological interactions in mixed-species forest plantations , 2006 .

[24]  D. V. Lear,et al.  Soil heterogeneity and root distribution of mature loblolly pine stands in piedmont soils , 1996 .

[25]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION UNDERGROUND , 1997 .

[26]  P. B. Tinker,et al.  Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil , 1971, Plant and Soil.

[27]  David Read,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers of ecosystem processes in heathland and boreal forest biomes , 2004 .

[28]  Claude Doussan,et al.  Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[29]  Raija Laiho,et al.  Changes in root biomass after water‐level drawdown on pine mires in southern Finland , 1996 .

[30]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes , 1996, Oecologia.

[31]  F. Danjon,et al.  Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.) , 2006 .