High Reproductive Rates Result in High Predation Risks: A Mechanism Promoting the Coexistence of Competing Prey in Spatially Structured Populations

I tested the hypothesis that spatial structure provides a trade‐off between reproduction and predation risk and thereby facilitates predator‐mediated coexistence of competing prey species. I compared a cellular automata model to a mean‐field model of two prey species and their common predator. In the mean‐field model, the prey species with the higher reproductive rate (the superior competitor) always outcompeted the other species (the inferior competitor), both in the presence of and the absence of the predator. In the cellular automata model, both prey species, which differed only in their reproductive rates, coexisted for a long time in the presence of their common predator at intermediate levels of predation. At low predation rates, the superior competitor dominated, while high predation rates favored the inferior competitor. This discrepancy in the results of the different models was due to a trade‐off that spontaneously emerged in spatially structured populations; that is, the more clustered distribution of the superior competitor made it more susceptible to predation. In addition, coexistence of competing prey species declined with increasing dispersal ranges of either prey or predator, which suggests that the trade‐off that results from spatial structure becomes less important as either prey or predator disperse over a broader range.

[1]  P. Charlesworth,et al.  COMPETITION ON A DIVIDED AND EPHEMERAL RESOURCE , 1979 .

[2]  S. Pacala,et al.  Herbivores and Plant Diversity , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[3]  S. Connell.  Is there safety-in-numbers for prey? , 2000 .

[4]  E. Bernays,et al.  Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators , 1991 .

[5]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  D. Janzen.  Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[7]  R. May,et al.  Competition within and between species in a patchy environment: Relations between microscopic and macroscopic models , 1985 .

[8]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[9]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[10]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[11]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Pathogen invasion and host extinction in lattice structured populations , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[13]  R. May,et al.  Interspecific competition, predation and species diversity: a comment. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[15]  J. Lubchenco.  Plant Species Diversity in a Marine Intertidal Community: Importance of Herbivore Food Preference and Algal Competitive Abilities , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[16]  M Tansky,et al.  Switching effect in prey--predator system. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  M. Hassell,et al.  Persistence of multispecies host-parasitoid interactions in spatially distributed models with local dispersal. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  S. Levin,et al.  Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Selection for intermediate mortality and reproduction rates in a spatially structured population , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  D. Wilson,et al.  Equilibrium diet: optimal foraging and prey coexistence , 1986 .

[21]  G. Hartvigsen.  Metapopulation biology: Ecology, genetics, and evolution , 1997 .

[22]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: A Simulation Model , 1981 .

[23]  Mark A. Lewis,et al.  3. Variability, Patchiness, and J u m p Dispersal i n the Spread of an Invading Population , 1998 .

[24]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[25]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[26]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[28]  M. Huston.  A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[29]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and ecological models , 1990 .

[30]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[31]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  A Graphical Model of Keystone Predators in Food Webs: Trophic Regulation of Abundance, Incidence, and Diversity Patterns in Communities , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[32]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[33]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[34]  R. May,et al.  Aggregation of Predators and Insect Parasites and its Effect on Stability , 1974 .

[35]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species , 1997 .

[36]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Switching effect of predation on competitive prey species. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  K. Fujii,et al.  Complexity-stability relationship of two-prey-one-predator species system model: local and global stability. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[39]  P. Crowley.  Predator-mediated coexistence: an equilibrium interpretation. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.