Optimization of cellular manufacturing systems design using the hybrid approach based on the ant colony and tabu search techniques

Cellular systems design problems (CSDP) constitute an important issue in the design of cellular manufacturing systems (CMS). A few years back, it emerged as the best alternative in manufacturing systems, representing a compromise between the efficiency of serial and the flexibility of batch production systems. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach for solving the CSDP for large industrial data sets. This procedure comprises an ant colony optimization (ACO) and the Tabu search (TS) procedure, which is added in order to improve the quality of the ACO solutions obtained. The problem is formulated as a binary integer programming model that might minimize the dissimilarities existing between machines or parts, and that is characterized as an NP-complete model. With this proposed approach, the results obtained show that it is efficient in terms of the quality and computational time of the solutions. To demonstrate the potential ability of the proposed approach, a numerical example has been investigated.

[1]  Hamid Seifoddini,et al.  Part-family formation for cellular manufacturing: A case study at Harnischfeger , 1999 .

[2]  Wing S. Chow,et al.  A novel machine grouping and knowledge-based approach for cellular manufacturing , 1993 .

[3]  B. Sarker,et al.  A similarity coefficient measure and machine-parts grouping in cellular manufacturing systems , 2000 .

[4]  R. Rajagopalan,et al.  Design of cellular production systems A graph-theoretic approach , 1975 .

[5]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  An improved neural network leader algorithm for part-machine grouping in group technology , 1993 .

[6]  A. Attila Islier,et al.  Group technology by an ant system algorithm , 2005 .

[7]  Askin Modeling Manufacturing Systems , 1993 .

[8]  Anthony Vannelli,et al.  Strategic subcontracting for efficient disaggregated manufacturing , 1986 .

[9]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  Cellular manufacturing in the U.S. industry: a survey of users , 1989 .

[10]  Gunter F.K. Purcheck,et al.  A mathematical classification as a basis for the design of group-technology production cells , 1975 .

[11]  Rajat Roy,et al.  Modelling and analysis of manufacturing systems: Ronald G. Askin and Charles R. Standridge John Wiley & Sons Chichester (1993) xvi + 461 pp £16.95 ISBN 0 471 57369 8 , 1994 .

[12]  Venu Venugopal,et al.  Soft-computing-based approaches to the group technology problem: A state-of-the-art review , 1999 .

[13]  J. King,et al.  Machine-component group formation in group technology , 1980 .

[14]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  Change to group technology: process organization is obsolete , 1992 .

[15]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[16]  Zhi-ming Wu,et al.  A genetic algorithm for manufacturing cell formation with multiple routes and multiple objectives , 2000 .

[17]  M. Chandrasekharan,et al.  ZODIAC—an algorithm for concurrent formation of part-families and machine-cells , 1987 .

[18]  John McAuley,et al.  Machine grouping for efficient production , 1972 .

[19]  Allan S. Carrie,et al.  Numerical taxonomy applied to group technology and plant layout , 1973 .