Indicator Patterns of Forced Change Learned by an Artificial Neural Network

Many problems in climate science require the identification of signals obscured by both the “noise” of internal climate variability and differences across models. Following previous work, we train an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the year of a given map of annual‐mean temperature (or precipitation) from forced climate model simulations. This prediction task requires the ANN to learn forced patterns of change amidst a background of climate noise and model differences. We then apply a neural network visualization technique (layerwise relevance propagation) to visualize the spatial patterns that lead the ANN to successfully predict the year. These spatial patterns thus serve as “reliable indicators” of the forced change. The architecture of the ANN is chosen such that these indicators vary in time, thus capturing the evolving nature of regional signals of change. Results are compared to those of more standard approaches like signal‐to‐noise ratios and multilinear regression in order to gain intuition about the reliable indicators identified by the ANN. We then apply an additional visualization tool (backward optimization) to highlight where disagreements in simulated and observed patterns of change are most important for the prediction of the year. This work demonstrates that ANNs and their visualization tools make a powerful pair for extracting climate patterns of forced change.

[1]  C. Deser,et al.  Pattern Recognition Methods to Separate Forced Responses from Internal Variability in Climate Model Ensembles and Observations , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[2]  J. Randerson,et al.  Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[3]  C. Deser,et al.  Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6 , 2020, Earth System Dynamics.

[4]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Climate change now detectable from any single day of weather at global scale , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[5]  Imme Ebert-Uphoff,et al.  Physically Interpretable Neural Networks for the Geosciences: Applications to Earth System Variability , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[6]  J. Hurrell,et al.  Viewing Forced Climate Patterns Through an AI Lens , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[7]  B. Santer,et al.  Quantifying stochastic uncertainty in detection time of human-caused climate signals , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Uncovering the Forced Climate Response from a Single Ensemble Member Using Statistical Learning , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[9]  Amy McGovern,et al.  Making the Black Box More Transparent: Understanding the Physical Implications of Machine Learning , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[10]  Jochem Marotzke,et al.  Quantifying the irreducible uncertainty in near‐term climate projections , 2018, WIREs Climate Change.

[11]  Auroop R. Ganguly,et al.  Intercomparison of model response and internal variability across climate model ensembles , 2018, Climate Dynamics.

[12]  U. Schneider,et al.  The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation. , 2018, Atmosphere.

[13]  J. Gregory,et al.  Irreducible uncertainty in near-term climate projections , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[14]  G. Hegerl,et al.  The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution , 2016 .

[15]  Alexander Binder,et al.  Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep Taylor decomposition , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Alexander Binder,et al.  On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualization , 2015, ArXiv.

[18]  V. Naik,et al.  Air Quality and Climate Connections , 2015, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps , 2013, ICLR.

[20]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  One hundred years of Arctic surface temperature variation due to anthropogenic influence , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  M. Sapiano The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP): Current Status and Transfer to Operations at NCDC , 2013 .

[22]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[23]  C. Deser,et al.  Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[24]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[25]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions , 2009 .

[26]  F. Zwiers,et al.  On the role of statistics in climate research , 2004 .

[27]  M. Holland,et al.  Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models , 2003 .

[28]  Deborah Silver,et al.  Feature Visualization , 1994, Scientific Visualization.

[29]  B. Santer,et al.  Signal-to-noise analysis of time-dependent greenhouse warming experiments , 1994 .

[30]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[31]  Arthur H. Rosenfeld,et al.  A New Estimate of the AverageEarth Surface Land TemperatureSpanning 1753 to 2011 , 2013 .

[32]  J. Wurtele,et al.  A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature , 2012 .

[33]  J. Janowiak,et al.  The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset , 1997 .