Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention

In the classic Stroop effect, naming the color of an incompatible color word (e.g. the word RED printed in green ink; say, 'green') is much slower and more error-prone than is naming the color of a control item (e.g. XXX or CAT printed in green; say 'green'). This seemingly simple interference phenomenon has long provided a fertile testing ground for theories of the cognitive and neural components of selective attention. We present a sketch of the behavioral phenomenon, focusing on the idea that the relative automaticity of the two dimensions determines the direction and the degree of interdimensional interference between them. We then present an outline of current parallel processing explanations that instantiate this automaticity account, and we show how existing interference data are captured by such models. We also consider how Stroop facilitation (faster response of 'red' to RED printed in red) can be understood. Along the way, we describe research on two tasks that have emerged from the basic Stroop phenomenon - negative priming and the emotional Stroop task. Finally, we provide a survey of brain imaging research, highlighting the possible roles of the anterior cingulate in maintaining attentional set and in processing conflict or competition situations.

[1]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  A. Henik,et al.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[3]  A. Revonsuo Words Interact with Colors in a Globally Aphasic Patient: Evidence from a Stroop-Like Task , 1995, Cortex.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Logan Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  C. Moorehead All rights reserved , 1997 .

[7]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  The crucial roles of stimulus matching and stimulus identity in negative priming , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Anterior cingulate gyrus dysfunction and selective attention deficits in schizophrenia: [15O]H2O PET study during single-trial Stroop task performance. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[10]  Colin M. Macleod John Ridley Stroop: Creator of a landmark cognitive task. , 1991 .

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[12]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? , 1992 .

[13]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[14]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[17]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[18]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Determinants of negative priming. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  F N Dyer,et al.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[21]  W. Glaser,et al.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  G. S. Klein,et al.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  S. Tipper The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  J. M. Cattell THE TIME IT TAKES TO SEE AND NAME OBJECTS , 1886 .

[25]  S Corkin,et al.  Stroop Color-Word Test performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 1990, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[26]  C. C. Duncan-Johnson Young Psychophysiologist Award address, 1980. P300 latency: a new metric of information processing. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[27]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[28]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  Why is naming longer than reading , 1969 .

[29]  S. Rauch,et al.  The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[31]  A. Clair,et al.  Performance on tests sensitive to impaired executive ability in schizophrenia, mania and well controls: acute and subacute phases , 1997, Schizophrenia Research.

[32]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[33]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984 .

[34]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anticipation causes increased blood flow to the anterior cingulate cortex , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[35]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. , 1988 .

[39]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. , 1999, Science.

[40]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Nonconscious Reading? Evidence From Neglect Dyslexia , 1994, Cortex.

[41]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Memorial Consequences of Automatized Encoding. , 1975 .

[42]  E. Perret The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Douglas G. Lowe,et al.  Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition , 1979 .

[44]  H. Soininen,et al.  Decline of Frontal Lobe Functions in Subjects with Age-associated Memory Impairment , 1997, Neurology.

[45]  Colin M. Macleod Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Edith Mägiste,et al.  Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals. , 1984 .

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[48]  Katherine M. Mathis,et al.  Transfer-Inappropriate Processing , 1998 .

[49]  E. Fox Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[51]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[52]  Penny A. MacDonald,et al.  Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attention to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[53]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[54]  George Bush,et al.  The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The colour centre in the cerebral cortex of man , 1989, Nature.

[56]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Negative priming is not task bound: A consistent pattern across naming and categorization tasks , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  A. Berti Nonconscious reading? Evidence from neglect dyslexia , 1995 .

[58]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  E. C. Dalrymple-Alford,et al.  Examination of Some Aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.

[60]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. A Horse Race of a Different Color: Stroop Interference Patterns With Transformed Words v , 2022 .

[61]  Ewa Wojciulik Nancy Kanwisher Implicit but not Explicit Feature Binding in a Balint's Patient , 1998 .

[62]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[63]  S. Joordens,et al.  Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: support for selection-feature mismatch. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  R. H. Phaf,et al.  SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  B. Kopell,et al.  The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. , 1981, Science.

[66]  C. Carter,et al.  Temporal Lobe Metabolic Differences in Medication-Free Outpatients with Schizophrenia via the PET-600 , 1996, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[67]  B. Vogt,et al.  Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  Timothy J. Wood,et al.  Negative priming without ignoring , 1998 .

[69]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.