A Chemical Category-Based Prioritization Approach for Selecting 75 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) for Tiered Toxicity and Toxicokinetic Testing

Summary: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of fluorinated substances of interest to researchers, regulators, and the public due to their widespread presence in the environment. A few PFASs have comparatively extensive amounts of human epidemiological, exposure, and experimental animal toxicity data (e.g., perfluorooctanoic acid), whereas little toxicity and exposure information exists for much of the broader set of PFASs. Given that traditional approaches to generate toxicity information are resource intensive, new approach methods, including in vitro high-throughput toxicity (HTT) testing, are being employed to inform PFAS hazard characterization and further (in vivo) testing. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) are collaborating to develop a risk-based approach for conducting PFAS toxicity testing to facilitate PFAS human health assessments. This article describes the construction of a PFAS screening library and the process by which a targeted subset of 75 PFASs were selected. Multiple factors were considered, including interest to the U.S. EPA, compounds within targeted categories, structural diversity, exposure considerations, procurability and testability, and availability of existing toxicity data. Generating targeted HTT data for PFASs represents a new frontier for informing priority setting. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4555

[1]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Development and Validation of a Computational Model for Androgen Receptor Activity , 2016, Chemical research in toxicology.

[2]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[3]  Zhanyun Wang,et al.  A Never-Ending Story of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)? , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[5]  Ian Ross,et al.  A review of emerging technologies for remediation of PFASs , 2018 .

[6]  Feng Xiao,et al.  Emerging poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in the aquatic environment: A review of current literature. , 2017, Water research.

[7]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  James Franklin,et al.  Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[10]  E. Montserrat [The never ending story]. , 1995, Medicina clinica.

[11]  Nicholas Ball,et al.  Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.