Species abundance distributions reveal environmental heterogeneity in modified landscapes

Summary 1.Environmental heterogeneity influences biodiversity patterns such as species richness and community composition, but we do not know how it shapes community structure in terms of the number of rare and abundant species. This question is particularly relevant to modified landscapes such as agro-ecosystems, where intensive management creates highly homogeneous landscapes, which often lead to loss of rare taxa and dominance by a few aggressive species. 2. It can be difficult to evaluate the effects of management on communities in different localities due to regional differences in species richness and composition. Because species abundance distributions (SADs) express assemblage structure in comparable units, they can be used to characterize communities irrespective of species composition, and for this reason provide a novel means of assessing the effects of management. 3. We analysed the SADs of weed communities across a gradient of environmental heterogeneity generated by different management treatments. We tested the hypothesis that environmental heterogeneity promotes multimodality in SADs by comparing observed patterns with those predicted for simulated random samples from homogeneous communities. 4. Observed SADs from a homogeneous environment did not deviate from predictions. By contrast, SADs from increasingly heterogeneous environments were progressively and consistently multimodal. 5. These results demonstrate that environmental heterogeneity, resulting from variation in management treatments, leaves a signature on the SAD. 6. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that Species Abundance Distributions are informative indicators of environmental heterogeneity in modified landscapes. Weed communities include both rare species, which are often of conservation interest and pose little threat to crops, and abundant species, which can be problematic. Our analysis suggests that creating environmental heterogeneity by varying management treatments across the landscape can be an effective way of promoting biodiversity and decreasing the abundance of problematic species.

[1]  Maria Dornelas,et al.  Multiple modes in a coral species abundance distribution. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[2]  P. Bàrberi,et al.  Functional biodiversity: An agroecosystem approach , 2008 .

[3]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Size and heterogeneity rather than landscape context determine plant species richness in semi‐natural grasslands , 2007 .

[4]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Patterns of relative species abundance in rainforests and coral reefs , 2007, Nature.

[5]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[6]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context , 2006 .

[7]  Y. Clough,et al.  Local and landscape factors in differently managed arable fields affect the insect herbivore community of a non‐crop plant species , 2006 .

[8]  Amy L. Freestone,et al.  Dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity shape scale-dependent diversity patterns in plant communities. , 2006, Ecology.

[9]  D. Engle,et al.  Should heterogeneity be the basis for conservation? Grassland bird response to fire and grazing. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  K. I. Ugland,et al.  On plotting species abundance distributions. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[11]  T. Hughes,et al.  Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2006, Nature.

[12]  R. Feagin Heterogeneity versus homogeneity: A conceptual and mathematical theory in terms of scale-invariant and scale-covariant distributions , 2005 .

[13]  John S. Gray,et al.  The impact of rare species on natural assemblages , 2005 .

[14]  Sean R Connolly,et al.  Community Structure of Corals and Reef Fishes at Multiple Scales , 2005, Science.

[15]  A. Hurlbert Species–energy relationships and habitat complexity in bird communities , 2004 .

[16]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[17]  P. Bàrberi,et al.  Size and composition of the weed seedbank after 7 years of different cover‐crop‐maize management systems , 2004 .

[18]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[19]  T. Palmer SPATIAL HABITAT HETEROGENEITY INFLUENCES COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IN AN AFRICAN ACACIA ANT GUILD , 2003 .

[20]  P. Jeanneret,et al.  Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes , 2003 .

[21]  B. McGill Does Mother Nature really prefer rare species or are log‐left‐skewed SADs a sampling artefact? , 2003 .

[22]  B. McGill A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[23]  A. Magurran,et al.  Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions , 2003, Nature.

[24]  K. Hamer,et al.  Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity , 2003 .

[25]  R. Hails,et al.  Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices , 2002, Nature.

[26]  Paolo Bàrberi,et al.  Long‐term tillage and crop rotation effects on weed seedbank size and composition , 2001 .

[27]  G. Graves,et al.  Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Rosenzweig Heeding the Warning in Biodiversity's Basic Law , 1999, Science.

[29]  E. Bonari,et al.  Size and composition of the weed seedbank under different management systems for continuous maize cropping. , 1998 .

[30]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Energy availability and habitat heterogeneity predict global riverine fish diversity , 1998, Nature.

[31]  J. Bakker,et al.  Soil seed banks in European grasslands: does land use affect regeneration perspectives? , 1997 .

[32]  N. Silvestri,et al.  Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation , 1997 .

[33]  Peter G. Kevan,et al.  Log-normality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystemic health : pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry heaths , 1997 .

[34]  J. Reynolds,et al.  On definition and quantification of heterogeneity , 1995 .

[35]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1995 .

[36]  Robert M. May,et al.  Lifting the veil on abundance patterns , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  K. I. Ugland,et al.  Lognormal Distributions and the Concept of Community Equilibrium , 1982 .

[38]  John S. Gray,et al.  Detecting pollution induced changes in communities using the log-normal distribution of individuals among species , 1981 .

[39]  John S. Gray,et al.  A possible method for the detection of pollution-induced disturbance on marine benthic communities☆ , 1979 .

[40]  F. W. Preston The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species , 1948 .

[41]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[42]  R. Norris Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management: Weed ecology, habitat management, and IPM , 2007 .

[43]  C. L. Mohler Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds: Weed evolution and community structure , 2001 .

[44]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions , 1997, Nature.

[45]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[46]  J. Gray Use and misuse of the log-normal plotting method for detection of effects of pollution - a reply to Shaw et al. (1983) , 1983 .