Weighted misclassification rate: a new measure of classification error designed for landscape pattern index

Thematic maps classified from remotely sensed data are usually used to derive landscape pattern index (LPI). As the classification error can propagate into the LPI calculation, correctly estimating the LPI error caused by the classification error is necessary in order to obtain a reliable landscape analysis. However, the widely accepted classification accuracy indices are not suitable for quantitatively describing the LPI error because the spatial distribution information of the classification errors is not considered. In this article, we developed a weighted misclassification rate (WMR) by assigning a certain weight to each misclassified pixel according to the spatial distribution information of the pixel. The results reveal that WMR is highly correlated with the error of number of patches (NP), total edge (TE), contagion (CONTAG), double-logged fractal dimension (DLFD) and aggregation index (AI). Moreover, the results suggest that the proposed WMR, as a supplement to the overall accuracy (OA) and the kappa coefficient (κ), is potentially a practicable measure of classification error for landscape analysis.

[1]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Importance of Matrix Construction for Multiple-Resolution Categorical Map Comparison , 2008 .

[2]  M. Turner Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? , 2005 .

[3]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Quality assessment for geo‐spatial objects derived from remotely sensed data , 2005 .

[4]  G. Shao,et al.  On the accuracy of landscape pattern analysis using remote sensing data , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Range of Categorical Associations for Comparison of Maps with Mixed Pixels , 2009 .

[6]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Focusing on feature-based differences in map comparison , 2006, J. Geogr. Syst..

[7]  F. Algostino,et al.  International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIV-5/W10 International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIV-5/W10 3D MODELING OF BOCCACCIO’S HOMETOWN THROUGHT A MULTISENSOR SURVEY , 2003 .

[8]  Changshan Wu,et al.  Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery , 2004 .

[9]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[10]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Map Misclassification Can Cause Large Errors in Landscape Pattern Indices: Examples from Habitat Fragmentation , 2006, Ecosystems.

[12]  J. M. Rey Benayas,et al.  Remote sensing and the future of landscape ecology , 2009 .

[13]  Hong S. He,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of neutral landscape models to represent a real landscape , 2004 .

[14]  Hidefumi Imura,et al.  Consistency of accuracy assessment indices for soft classification: Simulation analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Indices of landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Yuehui Li,et al.  The adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  G. Hess,et al.  Pattern and error in landscape ecology: A commentary , 1994, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  M. Herold,et al.  The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses , 2002 .

[19]  S. Stehman Estimating the Kappa Coefficient and its Variance under Stratified Random Sampling , 1996 .

[20]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover , 2009 .