Underutilization of evidence-based medications in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9 Registry.

The TIMI 9 Registry set out to assess the management strategies and outcomes of an unselected group of patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with ST segment elevation (STEMI). Demographic, procedural, and outcome data were collected from 840 consecutive patients with STEMI at 20 hospitals in United States and Canada between February and September 1994. Of them, 60% were treated with thrombolytic therapy, 9% with primary angioplasty, and 31% did not receive reperfusion therapy. Patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy were older, more likely female, and had a higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, higher Killip class on admission, and longer time from onset of symptoms to presentation. In evaluating the standard contraindications for fibrinolysis, approximately 10% in the thrombolytic group, 40% in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 34% of those not receiving reperfusion therapy had at least one of these characteristics. Of those patients treated with fibrinolysis, only 20% met the National Heart Attack Alert Program goal of door-to-drug time < or =30 minutes. Likewise, of those treated with primary PCI, only 30% had PCI performed within < or =90 minutes. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher for patients not treated with reperfusion therapy (18.9%), compared with patients treated with fibrinolysis (7.6%) and those treated with primary PCI (10.5%) (P < 0.001). Thus, we found that reperfusion therapy was underused, with only 69% of patients with STEMI receiving this proven treatment, and of those only 25% treated within the recommended timeline. These data suggest that there is room for improvement in the management of these patients.

[1]  J. Gore,et al.  Early and Pre-Discharge Aspirin Administration Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Current Clinical Practice and Trends in the United States , 2000, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[2]  C Lenfant,et al.  Timing is everything: motivating patients to call 9-1-1 at onset of acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  W. Rogers,et al.  Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  H A Feldman,et al.  Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[5]  C M Gibson,et al.  Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.

[6]  W. Rogers,et al.  Treatment and outcome of myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without invasive capability , 2000 .

[7]  S. Osganian,et al.  Prehospital delay in patients hospitalized with heart attack symptoms in the United States: the REACT trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study Group. , 1999, American heart journal.

[8]  J S Alpert,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction) , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  C. Cannon,et al.  Emergency department thrombolysis critical pathway reduces door‐to‐drug times in acute myocardial infarction , 1999, Clinical cardiology.

[10]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. , 1998, Circulation.

[11]  A. Berman,et al.  Effect of continuous quality improvement analysis on the delivery of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, American Journal of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Ornato,et al.  The Physician's Role in Minimizing Prehospital Delay in Patients at High Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  E. Antman Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9B trial. , 1996, Circulation.

[14]  R. Califf,et al.  Stroke after thrombolysis. Mortality and functional outcomes in the GUSTO-I trial. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries. , 1995, Circulation.

[15]  L. Bailey,et al.  Pretransplant risk factors and causes of death or graft loss after heart transplantation during early infancy. Pediatric Heart Transplant Team, Loma Linda. , 1995, Circulation.

[16]  R. M. Rubison,et al.  Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. , 1994, Circulation.

[17]  C. Fry,et al.  Science of urinary incontinence Report of a Meeting of Physicians and Scientists, University College London , 1994, The Lancet.

[18]  Daniel B. Mark,et al.  Diagnosing and managing unstable angina. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1994, Circulation.

[19]  W. Rogers,et al.  Effect on outcome of the presence or absence of chest pain at initiation of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Investigators. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  L. Wilkins Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia. , 1994, Circulation.

[21]  Walker,et al.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients , 1994 .

[22]  Johan Herlitz,et al.  Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction : collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994 .

[23]  W. Weaver,et al.  The association between on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J O'Keefe,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .

[25]  K. Mann,et al.  Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[26]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction who are ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[27]  C. Grines,et al.  Optimal utilization of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: concepts and controversies. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Y. Ohtsuki,et al.  ISOLATION OF HTLV-I FROM CEREBROSPINAL FLUID OF A PATIENT WITH MYELOPATHY , 1986, The Lancet.

[29]  E. Veys,et al.  HL-A AND INFECTIVE SACROILEITIS , 1974 .