Numerical Prediction of Iron Flow and Bottom Erosion in the Blast Furnace Hearth

The blast furnace (BF) campaign life, which is limited by the hearth erosion, will be decisive for the process to maintain its dominance in ore-based iron production, so timely prediction of the hearth erosion and proper measures to protect the hearth are important issues. The erosion at the hearth bottom has not received much attention, even though the region is believed to be the most vulnerable part of the hearth. A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model has been developed to deepen the understanding of iron flow and refractory erosion at the bottom of the hearth. Key boundary and internal conditions, such as slag–iron interface and dead man state, are provided by a BF drainage model which reproduces the tapping process. Simulations with the CFD model illustrate how different factors affect the flow pattern, hearth erosion profile, and bottom breakage ratio. It is shown that the dead man state plays an important role for the flow behavior and erosion conditions in the hearth. The model is demonstrated to predict two erosion types that are commonly encountered in practice.

[1]  J. M. Burgess,et al.  Experimental Model Study of the Physical Mechanisms Governing Blast Furnace Hearth Drainage , 1984 .

[2]  W. Cheng,et al.  Three dimensional iron flow and heat transfer in the hearth of a blast furnace during tapping process , 2005 .

[3]  S. K. Ajmani,et al.  Optimisation of taphole angle to minimise flow induced wall shear stress on the hearth , 2004 .

[4]  Henrik Saxén,et al.  Pressure Drop in the Blast Furnace Hearth with a Sitting Deadman , 2011 .

[5]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[6]  Henrik Saxén,et al.  Model Analysis of the Operation of the Blast Furnace Hearth with a Sitting and Floating Dead Man , 2003 .

[7]  Paul Zulli,et al.  CFD Modelling of Liquid Metal Flow and Heat Transfer in Blast Furnace Hearth , 2008 .

[8]  Chi-Hung Huang,et al.  Numerical prediction on the erosion in the hearth of a blast furnace during tapping process , 2009 .

[9]  Kalevi Raipala,et al.  Deadman and hearth phenomena in the blast furnace , 2000 .

[10]  D. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Methods of extending a blast-furnace campaign , 2006 .

[11]  Henrik Saxén,et al.  Novel model for estimation of liquid levels in the blast furnace hearth , 2004 .

[12]  Masakata Shimizu,et al.  Dynamics of Dead-man Coke and Hot Metal Flow in a Blast Furnace Hearth , 1990 .

[13]  Henrik Saxén,et al.  Simple simulation model of blast furnace hearth , 2005 .

[14]  S. K. Ajmani,et al.  Optimum taphole length and flow induced stresses , 2001 .

[15]  Yutaka Yamauchi,et al.  In-furnace Conditions as Prerequisites for Proper Use and Design of Mud to Control Blast Furnace Taphole Length , 1998 .

[16]  Sukanta K. Dash,et al.  Optimum Coke-free Space Volume in Blast Furnace Hearth by Wall Shear Stress Analysis , 2006 .

[17]  J. Truelove,et al.  Numerical modelling of iron flow and heat transfer in blast furnace hearth , 2002 .

[18]  Henrik Saxén,et al.  Model of Blast Furnace Hearth Drainage , 2012 .

[19]  S. K. Dash,et al.  Flow induced stress distribution on wall of blast furnace hearth , 2000 .