Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.

In computerized adaptive testing (CAT), traditionally the most discriminating items are selected to provide the maximum information so as to attain the highest efficiency in trait (theta) estimation. The maximum information (MI) approach typically results in unbalanced item exposure and hence high item-overlap rates across examinees. Recently, Yi and Chang (2003) proposed the multiple stratification (MS) method to remedy the shortcomings of MI. In MS, items are first sorted according to content, then difficulty and finally discrimination parameters. As discriminating items are used strategically, MS offers a better utilization of the entire item pool. However, for testing with imposed non-statistical constraints, this new stratification approach may not maintain its high efficiency. Through a series of simulation studies, this research explored the possible benefits of a mixture item selection approach (MS-MI), integrating the MS and MI approaches, in testing with non-statistical constraints. In all simulation conditions, MS consistently outperformed the other two competing approaches in item pool utilization, while the MS-MI and the MI approaches yielded higher measurement efficiency and offered better conformity to the constraints. Furthermore, the MS-MI approach was shown to perform better than MI on all evaluation criteria when control of item exposure was imposed.

[1]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Controlling Item Exposure Conditional on Ability in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[2]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Optimal Design of Item Banks for Computerized Adaptive Tests , 1996 .

[3]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing , 1982 .

[4]  Cynthia G. Parshall,et al.  New Algorithms for Item Selection and Exposure Control with Computerized Adaptive Testing. , 1995 .

[5]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Should More Discriminating Items be Used First? , 2001 .

[6]  Z. Ying,et al.  a-Stratified Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing with b Blocking , 2001 .

[7]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  Solving Complex Constraints in a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing Designs , 2000 .

[8]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  a-Stratified CAT design with content blocking. , 2003, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[9]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  An Examination of Item Selection Rules by Stratified CAT Designs Integrated with Content Balancing Methods , 2001 .

[10]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  A Method for Severely Constrained Item Selection in Adaptive Testing , 1992 .

[11]  Z. Ying,et al.  a-Stratified Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1999 .

[12]  Tianyou Wang,et al.  Properties of Ability Estimation Methods in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[13]  Fumiko Samejima The bias function of the maximum likelihood estimate of ability for the dichotomous response level , 1993 .

[14]  Ronald D. Armstrong,et al.  IRT Test Assembly Using Network-Flow Programming , 1998 .

[15]  Cynthia G. Parshall,et al.  Nearest Neighbors, Simple Strata, and Probabilistic Parameters: An Empirical Comparison of Methods for Item Exposure Control in CATs , 2001 .

[16]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  The role of parametric assumptions in adaptive Bayesian estimation. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[17]  van der Linden,et al.  Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests , 2000 .

[18]  Walter D. Way Protecting the Integrity of Computerized Testing Item Pools , 1998 .

[19]  Theo J. H. M. Eggen,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: What It is and How It Works. , 1998 .

[20]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  A Model for Optimal Constrained Adaptive Testing , 1998 .

[21]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing , 1998 .

[22]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  Practical Issues in Large-Scale Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1996 .

[23]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1996 .

[24]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory, Applications, and Standards , 1991 .