Computational fluid dynamics applied to virtually deployed drug-eluting coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: Clinical translations derived from a proof-of-concept

Background: Three-dimensional design simulations of coronary metallic stents utilizing mathematical and computational algorithms have emerged as important tools for understanding biomechanical stent properties, predicting the interaction of the implanted platform with the adjacent tissue, and informing stent design enhancements. Herein, we demonstrate the hemodynamic implications following virtual implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds using finite element methods and advanced computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to visualize the device-flow interaction immediately after implantation and following scaffold resorption over time. Methods and Results: CFD simulations with time averaged wall shear stress (WSS) quantification following virtual bioresorbable scaffold deployment in idealized straight and curved geometries were performed. WSS was calculated at the inflow, endoluminal surface (top surface of the strut), and outflow of each strut surface post-procedure (stage I) and at a time point when 33% of scaffold resorption has occurred (stage II). The average WSS at stage I over the inflow and outflow surfaces was 3.2 and 3.1 dynes/cm2 respectively and 87.5 dynes/cm2 over endoluminal strut surface in the straight vessel. From stage I to stage II, WSS increased by 100% and 142% over the inflow and outflow surfaces, respectively, and decreased by 27% over the endoluminal strut surface. In a curved vessel, WSS change became more evident in the inner curvature with an increase of 63% over the inflow and 66% over the outflow strut surfaces. Similar analysis at the proximal and distal edges demonstrated a large increase of 486% at the lateral outflow surface of the proximal scaffold edge. Conclusions: The implementation of CFD simulations over virtually deployed bioresorbable scaffolds demonstrates the transient nature of device/flow interactions as the bioresorption process progresses over time. Such hemodynamic device modeling is expected to guide future bioresorbable scaffold design.

[1]  Michael C. McDaniel,et al.  The sheer stress of straightening the curves: biomechanics of bioabsorbable stents. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  Georg Nickenig,et al.  A novel paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin abluminal biodegradable polymer 9-month outcomes with the JACTAX HD stent. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  Soo-Jin Kang,et al.  In-stent neoatherosclerosis: a final common pathway of late stent failure. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Bernard Chevalier,et al.  A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  Bernard Chevalier,et al.  Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the plaque? , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[6]  Kim Van der Heiden,et al.  The effects of stenting on shear stress: relevance to endothelial injury and repair. , 2013, Cardiovascular research.

[7]  Theodore A Bass,et al.  Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R M Nerem,et al.  Hemodynamics and the vascular endothelium. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  Brett E Bouma,et al.  A case of lipid core plaque progression and rupture at the edge of a coronary stent: elucidating the mechanisms of drug-eluting stent failure. , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Attila Thury,et al.  Images in cardiovascular medicine. Focal in-stent restenosis near step-up: roles of low and oscillating shear stress? , 2002, Circulation.

[11]  P. Serruys,et al.  Vascular restoration therapy: the fourth revolution in interventional cardiology and the ultimate "rosy" prophecy. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Edelman,et al.  Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Yiannis S. Chatzizisis,et al.  Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Habib Samady,et al.  Biomechanical assessment of fully bioresorbable devices. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  J J Wentzel,et al.  Coronary stent implantation changes 3-D vessel geometry and 3-D shear stress distribution. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade? , 2012, European heart journal.

[17]  Shu Q. Liu,et al.  Role of blood shear stress in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell migration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  P. Serruys,et al.  Edge vascular response after percutaneous coronary intervention: an intracoronary ultrasound and optical coherence tomography appraisal: from radioactive platforms to first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents and bioresorbable scaffolds. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.