Modeling of equilibrium point trajectory control in human arm movements

MODELING OF EQUILIBRIUM POINT TRAJECTORY CONTROL IN HUMAN ARM MOVEMENTS by Kai Chen The underlying concept of the Equilibrium Point Hyp othesis (EPH) is that the CNS provides a virtual trajectory of joint motion, repr senting spacing and timing, with actual movement dynamics being produced by interactions of limb inertia, muscle viscosity and speed/position feedback from muscle spindles. To co unter criticisms of the EPH, investigators have proposed the use of complex virt ual trajectories, non-linear damping, stiffness and time varying stiffness to the EPH mod el. While these features allow the EPH to adequately produce human joint velocities, t hey conflict with the EPH’s premise of simple pre-planned monotonic control of movement trajectory. As a result, this study proposed an EPH based method, which provides a simp ler echanism in motor control without conflict with the core advantages of the or iginal approach. This work has proposed relative damping as an addi tion to the EPH model to predict the single and two joint arm movements. Thi s addition results in simulated data that not only closely match experimental angle data , but also match the experimental joint torques. In addition, it is suggested that this mod ifie model can be used to predict the multi-joint angular trajectories with fast and norm al velocities, without the need for time varying or non-linear stiffness and damping, but wi th simple monotonic virtual trajectories. In the following study, this relative damping model has been further enhanced with an EMG-based determination of the vir tual trajectory and with physiologically realistic neuromuscular delays. The results of unobstructed voluntary movement studies suggest that the EPH models use re alistic impedance values and produce desired joint trajectories and joint torque s in unperturbed voluntary arm movement. A subsequent study of obstructed voluntary arm mov ement extended the relative damping concept, and incorporated the influential f actors of the mechanical behavior of the neural, muscular and skeletal system in the con trol and coordination of arm posture and movement. A significant problem of the study is how this information should be used to modify control signals to achieve desired perfor mance. This study used an EPH model to examine changes of controlling signals for arm m ovements in the context of adding perturbation/load in the form of forces/torques. Th e mechanical properties and reflex actions of muscles of the elbow joint were examined . Brief unexpected torque/force pulses of identical magnitude and time duration wer e introduced at different stages of the movement in a random order by a pre-programmed 3 de gree of freedom (DOF) robotic arm (MOOG FCS HapticMaster). The results show that e subjects may maintain the same control parameters (virtual trajectory, stiffn ess and damping) regardless of added perturbations that cause substantial changes in EMG activity and kinematics. MODELING OF EQUILIBRIUM POINT TRAJECTORY CONTROL IN HUMAN ARM MOVEMENTS

[1]  J. Hollerbach,et al.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Anatol G. Feldman,et al.  The role of stretch reflex threshold regulation in normal and impaired motor control , 1994, Brain Research.

[4]  J. McIntyre,et al.  Servo Hypotheses for the Biological Control of Movement. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[6]  U. Windhorst ON THE ROLE OF RECURRENT INHIBITORY FEEDBACK IN MOTOR CONTROL , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Rymer,et al.  End points of planar reaching movements are disrupted by small force pulses: an evaluation of the hypothesis of equifinality. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Flash,et al.  The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Kai Chen,et al.  Modeling of Relative Damping in Defining the Equilibrium Point Trajectory for the Human Arm Movement Control , 2008 .

[12]  Qinyin Qiu,et al.  Incorporating Haptic Effects Into Three-Dimensional Virtual Environments to Train the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  J. Lackner,et al.  Coriolis-force-induced trajectory and endpoint deviations in the reaching movements of labyrinthine-defective subjects. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Hinder,et al.  The Case for an Internal Dynamics Model versus Equilibrium Point Control in Human Movement , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  J. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst is modified by perturbations preceding movement , 1986, Brain Research.

[16]  D. Ostry,et al.  Relationship between cocontraction, movement kinematics and phasic muscle activity in single-joint arm movement , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  D. Ostry,et al.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  M. Latash Control of human movement , 1993 .

[19]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  M. Latash,et al.  An equilibrium-point model for fast, single-joint movement: I. Emergence of strategy-dependent EMG patterns. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  A. G. Feldman Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control , 1986 .

[22]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  D J Ostry,et al.  Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  A. G. Feldman Origin and advances of the equilibrium-point hypothesis. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[25]  L R Young,et al.  The relaxed oscillation technique for the determination of the moment of inertia of limb segments. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  G. L. Gottlieb,et al.  Reconstruction of shifting elbow joint compliant characteristics during fast and slow movements , 1991, Neuroscience.

[27]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  S. Cannon,et al.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[30]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  Rejecting the equilibrium-point hypothesis. , 1998, Motor control.

[31]  Anatol G. Feldman Threshold position control signifies a common spatial frame of reference for motor action and kinesthesia , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[32]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The timing of control signals underlying fast point-to-point arm movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling , 1997, Neuroscience.

[34]  Anatol G. Feldman,et al.  The λ model for motor control: More than meets the eye , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Jeroen B J Smeets,et al.  Relative damping improves linear mass-spring models of goal-directed movements. , 2002, Human movement science.

[36]  Charles Capaday,et al.  The effects of baclofen on the stretch reflex parameters of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Central modifications of reflex parameters may underlie the fastest arm movements. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Anatol G. Feldman,et al.  The relationship between control, kinematic and electromyographic variables in fast single-joint movements in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The equilibrium-point hypothesis is still doing fine , 2000 .

[41]  G. Zahalak A comparison of the mechanical behavior of the cat soleus muscle with a distribution-moment model. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[42]  Gerald L. Gottlieb,et al.  The generation of the efferent command and the importance of joint compliance in fast elbow movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  David J. Ostry,et al.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Paul Cellucci The Relationship , 2005 .

[46]  James H. Stapleton,et al.  Testing Hypotheses , 2007, Data Analysis for Business, Economics, and Policy.