Leading organisations expect that all business processes, including facilities management (FM), achieve world‐class standards. This paper presents the results of an international, collaborative investigation, on behalf of a UK‐based blue chip company and a member of the Facilities Management Foundation, to identify organisations that are recognised as exemplars of world‐class FM (WCFM) and to understand the processes that underpin world‐class performance. Much FM practice remains cost focused, rooted in operations and concerned primarily with maintaining the steady‐state position of an organisation. In contrast, most authors propose that facilities should be strategically planned, aligned to business needs and demonstrate contribution to achieving explicit business objectives. They argue for a common language and for conditions that ensure that facilities add value to the business. Very little is known about how these conditions are created in different organisational contexts. The paper describes a heuristic study of three cases, selected as exemplars of WCFM, focusing on the underlying processes. Project partners in Australia, Norway and the UK conducted the case studies to a common brief. The paper presents the framework that was created to enable comparison of FM processes in the case studies and a matrix of business drivers and FM outputs that was adapted for the project. The investigation identifies three FM roles ‐ as translator, processor and demonstrator. Facilities management identifies business needs and translates strategy into workplaces, owns the processes of providing those workplaces and demonstrates their impact on organisational outcomes. The paper develops a WCFM framework to provide a management tool for considering and relating FM projects at different levels in an organisation. The study highlights the importance of reframing FM projects as business projects, and concludes that participation at senior management, business unit and individual levels in the organisation is an important factor in obtaining value. The study also highlights the need for effective change management processes continually to adapt the workplace to changing business needs, and shows how FM provides value through sustaining the organisation through business cycles.
[1]
J. Granath,et al.
Workplace making ‐ A strategic activity
,
1999
.
[2]
Keith Alexander,et al.
Facilities Management: Theory and Practice
,
1996
.
[3]
David Tranfield,et al.
Performance measures: relating facilities to business indicators
,
1995
.
[4]
C. Moustakas,et al.
Heuristic Inquiry
,
1985
.
[5]
Bob Grimshaw,et al.
Chasing the mirage: managing facilities in a virtual world
,
2000
.
[6]
Bev Nutt,et al.
Linking FM practice and research
,
1999
.
[7]
Bob Grimshaw,et al.
Facilities management: the wider implications of managing change
,
1999
.
[8]
Bernard Williams,et al.
Cost‐effective facilities management: a practical approach
,
1996
.