Cross-platform implementation, verification and validation of advanced mathematical models of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings

Abstract Stable inelastic response of seismic isolation bearings is key to the successful performance of base isolated nuclear structures, buildings and bridges. Since full-scale isolated nuclear structures (and buildings) cannot be tested for extreme earthquakes on simulators because their payload capacities are orders of magnitude smaller than weights of structures, confirmation of adequate performance must be provided by analysis of numerical models and testing of individual bearings. As the consequences of isolator failure are high, for example, core damage in a nuclear power plant and collapse for a building, the numerical models of the key nonlinear components, namely, the isolators, must be verified and validated (V + V). Herein, advanced models of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings are implemented as user elements in the open-source code OpenSees, and the commercial codes ABAQUS and LS-DYNA. These advanced models are verified and validated following ASME best practice to predict response under extreme loadings. Sources of error in the computational models are quantified, and where possible, eliminated. Those isolator characteristics crucial to robust estimates of performance are identified. Experiments are performed to obtain data for validation. The isolator models are validated using data from experiments and values of model parameters are recommended.

[1]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings , 2014 .

[2]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Response of base-isolated nuclear structures to extreme earthquake shaking , 2015 .

[3]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[4]  T. Trucano,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Predictive Capability in Computational Engineering and Physics , 2004 .

[5]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi‐directional ground motions , 1986 .

[6]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Effects of Heating on the Behavior of Lead-Rubber Bearings. II: Verification of Theory , 2009 .

[7]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing: Planning, management, and implementation issues , 2010 .

[8]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  On the role of code comparisons in verification and validation. , 2003 .

[9]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Modeling viscous damping in nonlinear response history analysis of buildings for earthquake excitation , 2016 .

[10]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Vertical Stiffness of Elastomeric and Lead–Rubber Seismic Isolation Bearings , 2007 .

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Nonlinear Model for Lead-Rubber Bearings Including Axial-Load Effects , 2005 .

[12]  Ian D. Aiken,et al.  A mechanical model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings including the influence of axial load , 2009 .

[13]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing , 2011 .

[14]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of 3‐D‐Base‐Isolated Structures , 1991 .

[15]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Experimental investigation of cavitation in elastomeric seismic isolation bearings , 2015 .

[16]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[17]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Modeling strength degradation in lead–rubber bearings under earthquake shaking , 2010 .