Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.

It has been suggested that the endurance of cemented femoral reconstructions in total hip arthroplasty is affected by the creep of acrylic cement, but it is not known to what extent cement creeps under loading conditions in vivo, or how this affects load transfer. We have simulated the long-term creep properties of acrylic cement in finite-element models of femoral stem constructs and analysed their effects. We investigated whether subsidence rates measured in vivo could be explained by creep of acrylic cement, and if polished, unbonded, stems accommodated creep better than bonded stems. Our findings showed that polished prostheses subsided only about 50 microm as a result of cement creep. The long-term prosthetic subsidence rates caused by creep of acrylic cement are therefore very small and do not explain the excessive migration rates which have sometimes been reported. Cement creep did, however, relax cement stresses and create a more favourable stress distribution at the interfaces. These trends were found around both the bonded and unbonded stems. Our results did not confirm that polished, unbonded, stems accommodated creep better than bonded stems in terms of cement and interface stress patterns.

[1]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  D L Bartel,et al.  Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Creep behavior of hand-mixed Simplex P bone cement under cyclic tensile loading. , 1994, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[5]  R. Huiskes Mechanical failure in total hip arthroplasty with cement , 1993 .

[6]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic densitometry of bone adjacent to a femoral prosthesis. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  W H Harris,et al.  Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement‐Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  W J Maloney,et al.  The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  A. J. Lee,et al.  Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. , 1988, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[11]  S. Pal,et al.  Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  W. Harris,et al.  Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: a preliminary study. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  A. J. Lee,et al.  Time-Dependent Properties of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement , 1990 .

[14]  W H Harris,et al.  Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged simplex P bone cement , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  D J Chwirut,et al.  Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A three-dimensional biomechanical model of hip musculature. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.