Using Self-Determination Theory in Social Robots to Increase Motivation in L2 Word Learning

This study presents a second language word learning experiment using a social robot with motivational strategies. These strategies were implemented in a social robot tutor to stimulate preschool children’s intrinsic motivation. Subsequently, we investigated their effect on children’s task engagement and word learning performance. The strategies were derived from the Self-Determination Theory, a well-known psychological theory that assumes that intrinsic motivation is strongly related to the fulfilment of three basic human needs, namely the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. We found an increase in the strength and duration of task engagement when all three psychological needs were supported by the robot. However, no significant results for learning gains were observed. Our intervention appears a promising method for improving child-robot interactions in educational settings, especially to sustain in long-term interactions. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; • Applied computing → Interactive learning environments. ACM Reference Format: Peggy van Minkelen, Carmen Gruson, Pleun van Hees, Mirle Willems, Jan de Wit, Rian Aarts, Jaap Denissen, and Paul Vogt. 2020. Using Self-Determination Theory in Social Robots to Increase Motivation in L2 Word Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’20), March 23–26, 2020, Cambridge, United Kingdom. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374828

[1]  Sanne H. G. van der Ven,et al.  Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review , 2018, Review of Educational Research.

[2]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.

[3]  Jan de Wit,et al.  A Robot Teaching Young Children a Second Language: The Effect of Multiple Interactions on Engagement and Performance , 2018, HRI.

[4]  Fotios Papadopoulos,et al.  Investigating the Effects of a Robot Peer on L2 Word Learning , 2018, HRI.

[5]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  The Effect of a Robot’s Gestures and Adaptive Tutoring on Children’s Acquisition of Second Language Vocabularies , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Guidelines for Designing Social Robots as Second Language Tutors , 2018, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[7]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child Speech Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: Evaluations and Recommendations , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[8]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effects of framing a robot as a social agent or as a machine on children's social behavior , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[10]  Wafa Johal,et al.  Child-robot spatial arrangement in a learning by teaching activity , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[11]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[12]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Social robot tutoring for child second language learning , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  The Robot Who Tried Too Hard: Social Behaviour of a Robot Tutor Can Negatively Affect Child Learning , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  The Impact of Social Robotics on L2 Learners’ Anxiety and Attitude in English Vocabulary Acquisition , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[15]  Andri Ioannou,et al.  Pre-schoolers’ Interest and Caring Behaviour Around a Humanoid Robot , 2015 .

[16]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  Employing Humanoid Robots for Teaching English Language in Iranian Junior High-Schools , 2014, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[17]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Towards Empathic Virtual and Robotic Tutors , 2013, AIED.

[18]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[19]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[20]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Effect of robot's active touch on people's motivation , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Willy Lens,et al.  Motivational Profiles from a Self-Determination Perspective: The Quality of Motivation Matters. , 2009 .

[22]  Christopher P. Niemiec,et al.  Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom , 2009 .

[23]  F. Dochy,et al.  The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[24]  Sungho Kim,et al.  The educational use of home robots for children , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[25]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[27]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[28]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A Comparison of Children Learning New Words from Robots , Tablets , & People , 2015 .

[29]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: A tool for constructive learning in preschool education , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Kindergarten social assistive robot: First meeting and ethical issues , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  FridinMarina Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot , 2014 .

[32]  Janie H. Wilson,et al.  immediacy Scale Represents Four Factors: Nonverbal and Verbal Components Predict Student Outcomes , 2008 .

[33]  Toni M. Kempler,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environments , 2005 .

[34]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.