Computational pathology improves risk stratification of a multi-gene assay for early stage ER+ breast cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Madabhushi | M. Feldman | S. Ganesan | Hannah Gilmore | A. Janowczyk | N. Davidson | A. Harbhajanka | M. Mokhtari | P. Fu | Germán Corredor | L. Goldstein | Cheng Lu | V. Parmar | S. Desai | P. Toro | C. Buzzy | C. Koyuncu | Haojia Li | Haley Corbin | Jon Whitney | Yulin Chen
[1] Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen,et al. Deep learning models for histologic grading of breast cancer and association with disease prognosis , 2022, npj Breast Cancer.
[2] L. Solorzano,et al. Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning. , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[3] G. Calip,et al. Association of Race/Ethnicity and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score With Breast Cancer-Specific Mortality Among US Women. , 2021, JAMA oncology.
[4] A. Nassar,et al. Oncotype DX and Prosigna in breast cancer patients: A comparison study. , 2021, Cancer treatment and research communications.
[5] E. Winer,et al. Oncotype DX testing in node-positive breast cancer strongly impacts chemotherapy use at a comprehensive cancer center , 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[6] Jordan H Creed,et al. MatSurv: Survival analysis and visualization in MATLAB , 2020, J. Open Source Softw..
[7] A. Jemal,et al. Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[8] Ronnachai Jaroensri,et al. Artificial intelligence in digital breast pathology: Techniques and applications , 2019, Breast.
[9] Ahmedin Jemal,et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019 , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[10] Ahmedin Jemal,et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019 , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[11] A. Madabhushi,et al. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology — new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology , 2019, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.
[12] P. V. van Diest,et al. Significant inter‐ and intra‐laboratory variation in grading of invasive breast cancer: A nationwide study of 33,043 patients in the Netherlands , 2019, International journal of cancer.
[13] Daniel Racoceanu,et al. Deep Learning for Semantic Segmentation vs. Classification in Computational Pathology: Application to Mitosis Analysis in Breast Cancer Grading , 2019, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..
[14] A. Madabhushi,et al. Nuclear shape and orientation features from H&E images predict survival in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers , 2018, Laboratory Investigation.
[15] A. Madabhushi,et al. Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer , 2018, BMC Cancer.
[16] Andrew Janowczyk,et al. A deep learning based strategy for identifying and associating mitotic activity with gene expression derived risk categories in estrogen receptor positive breast cancers , 2017, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.
[17] Yan Li,et al. Computer-aided prognosis on breast cancer with hematoxylin and eosin histopathology images: A review , 2017, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.
[18] George Lee,et al. Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Medical Image Anal..
[19] Anant Madabhushi,et al. Emerging Themes in Image Informatics and Molecular Analysis for Digital Pathology. , 2016, Annual review of biomedical engineering.
[20] Andrew Janowczyk,et al. Automated Tubule Nuclei Quantification and Correlation with Oncotype DX risk categories in ER+ Breast Cancer Whole Slide Images , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[21] Nabil Wasif,et al. Back to Basics: Traditional Nottingham Grade Mitotic Counts Alone are Significant in Predicting Survival in Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[22] Valerie F. Reyna,et al. Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[23] Rohit Bhargava,et al. Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Score , 2008, Modern Pathology.
[24] Hanina Hibshoosh,et al. Interobserver agreement and reproducibility in classification of invasive breast carcinoma: an NCI breast cancer family registry study , 2006, Modern Pathology.
[25] E. Perez,et al. E2197: Phase III AT (doxorubicin/docetaxel) vs. AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive and high risk node negative breast cancer , 2005 .
[26] I. Ellis,et al. Expert Commentary. , 2002, Histopathology.
[27] P. Ravdin,et al. Prognostic factors in early breast carcinoma , 1994, Cancer.
[28] Franz Aurenhammer,et al. Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure , 1991, CSUR.
[29] L. Lin,et al. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.
[30] Hannah Gilmore. Pediatric Pathology , 2017, Modern Pathology.
[31] M. Fernö,et al. Histologic grading in breast cancer--reproducibility between seven pathologic departments. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group. , 2000, Acta oncologica.