Static threshold fluctuations have already been analyzed by other Authors. In this work, short and long term intra- and interindividual threshold fluctuations in static perimetry were compared with those obtained by kinetic perimetry under the same testing conditions. Both normal and pathological visual fields were considered. A computerized Goldmann perimeter (Perikon, Optikon) (Fig. 1) was employed to reproduce constant examination conditions and to avoid any variables due to different examiners. This investigation has demonstrated that intraindividual threshold fluctuation in
Open image in new window
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The computerized Goldmann perimeter ‘PERIKON’
both static and kinetic procedures are not consistently correlated, however a better correlation is noted if the sensitivity gradient steepness increases. The interindividual overall average fluctuation is lower with the kinetic than the static method in both the short and long term, without any relationship to eccentricity.
[1]
F. Fankhauser,et al.
Threshold Fluctuations, Interpolations and Spatial Resolution in Perimetry
,
1979
.
[2]
A Heijl,et al.
COMPUTER TEST LOGICS FOR AUTOMATIC PERIMETRY
,
1977,
Acta ophthalmologica.
[3]
S M Drance,et al.
Early visual field disturbances in glaucoma.
,
1977,
Archives of ophthalmology.
[4]
H Bebie,et al.
STATIC PERIMETRY: ACCURACY AND FLUCTUATIONS
,
1976,
Acta ophthalmologica.
[5]
S. Drance,et al.
The Estimation and Testing of the Components of Long-Term Fluctuation of the Differential Light Threshold
,
1983
.
[6]
E. Werner,et al.
Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs.
,
1982,
Archives of ophthalmology.