Furthering patient adherence: A position paper of the international expert forum on patient adherence based on an internet forum discussion

BackgroundAs the problem of patient non-adherence persists and a solution appears hard to be found, it continues to be important to look for new ways to further the issue. We recently conducted a meta-review of adherence intervention studies which yielded a preliminary agenda for future research, practice and theory development in patient adherence. The objective of the present project was to find out to what extent adherence experts consider this agenda relevant and feasible.MethodsThe thirty-five corresponding authors of the review studies included in the meta-review were invited to join the International Expert Forum on Patient Adherence and to participate in a four-week web-based focus group discussion. The discussion was triggered by the points on the preliminary agenda presented as propositions to which forum members could react. Two researchers analysed the transcripts and selected relevant phrases.ResultsTwenty adherence experts participated. Various ideas and viewpoints were raised. After the closure of the web-site, the expert forum was asked to authorize the synthesis of the discussion, to list the propositions in order of priority and to answer a few questions on the use of the web-based focus group as a tool to obtain expert opinions. Their ranking showed that the development of simple interventions is the most promising step to take in fostering patient adherence, preferably within a multidisciplinary setting of medical, pharmaceutical, social and technical science and, not in the least, by incorporating patients' perspectives.ConclusionFor enhancing adherence, the development of simple interventions originating from a multidisciplinary perspective including patients' input, appears most promising. Disclosing patients' perspectives requires open communication about patients' expectations, needs and experiences in taking medication and about what might help them to become and remain adherent.

[1]  Sandra van Dulmen,et al.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[2]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. , 2002, JAMA.

[3]  R. Lissitz,et al.  Computer-Mediated Focus Groups , 2000, Evaluation review.

[4]  J. Kitzinger The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants , 1994 .

[5]  P. Burkhart,et al.  Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[6]  Abigail L. Wroe,et al.  Intentional and Unintentional Nonadherence: A Study of Decision Making , 2002, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[7]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Young patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences in paediatric oncology: Results of online focus groups , 2007, BMC pediatrics.

[8]  K A McKibbon,et al.  Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  S. De Geest,et al.  Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action , 2003, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.