When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.

Tests, as learning events, can enhance subsequent recall more than do additional study opportunities, even without feedback. Such advantages of testing tend to appear, however, only at long retention intervals and/or when criterion tests stress recall, rather than recognition, processes. We propose that the interaction of the benefits of testing versus restudying with final-test delay and format reflects not only that successful retrievals are more powerful learning events than are re-presentations but also that the distribution of memory strengths across items is shifted differentially by testing and restudying. The benefits of initial testing over restudying, in this view, should increase as the delay or format of the final test makes that test more difficult. Final-test difficulty, not the similarity of initial-test and final-test conditions, should determine the benefits of testing. In Experiments 1 and 2 we indeed found that initial cued-recall testing enhanced subsequent recall more than did restudying when the final test was a difficult (free-recall) test but not when it was an easier (cued-recall) test that matched the initial test. The results of Experiment 3 supported a new prediction of the distribution framework: namely, that the final cued-recall test that did not show a benefit of testing in Experiment 1 should show such a benefit when that test was made more difficult by introducing retroactive interference. Overall, our results suggest that the differential consequences of initial testing versus restudying reflect, in part, differences in how items distributions are shifted by testing and studying.

[1]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Endel Tulving,et al.  The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning , 1967 .

[3]  C. Izawa,et al.  Optimal Potentiating Effects and Forgetting-Prevention Effects of Tests in Paired-Associate Learning. , 1970 .

[4]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice , 1996 .

[6]  W. Estes Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. , 1955, Psychological review.

[7]  G. A. Allen,et al.  Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates , 1969 .

[8]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory , 1980 .

[9]  Philippe C. Duchastel,et al.  Testing versus review: Effects on retention. , 1982 .

[10]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Investigations of the testing effect. , 1996 .

[11]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[12]  R. Woodworth Archives of psychology , 2010 .

[13]  Joe Eichner,et al.  Study versus test trials and long-term retention in free-recall learning , 1971 .

[14]  J. J. Franks,et al.  The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall , 1978 .

[15]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention , 2007 .

[16]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[18]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Retroactive inhibition of meaningful discourse. , 1971 .

[19]  Fraser A. Bleasdale,et al.  Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[20]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  H. Arkes,et al.  A mediational explanation of the priority effect , 1979 .

[22]  D. Robbins,et al.  The priority effect: Test effects on negative transfer and control lists , 1976 .

[23]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Altering memory representations through retrieval. , 1985 .

[24]  C. Thompson,et al.  How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. , 1978 .

[25]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Dissociating Automatic and Consciously Controlled Effects of Study/Test Compatibility , 1996 .

[26]  R. Bjork,et al.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  W. Runquist,et al.  Some effects of remembering on forgetting , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R. Bjork,et al.  Why Tests Appear to Prevent Forgetting: A Distribution-Based Bifurcation Model. , 2011 .

[30]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[31]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Learning from tests: Effects of spacing , 1977 .

[32]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. , 1987 .

[33]  G. A. Allen,et al.  The Priority Effect in the A-B, A-C Paradigm and Subjects' Expectations. , 1976 .

[34]  J. Luis Guasch,et al.  Costs and benefits , 2019, Joint Audit 2019 – Enhancing Tax Co-operation and Improving Tax Certainty.

[35]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[36]  Ronald J. Nungester,et al.  Testing Effects Measured with Alternate Test Forms , 1982 .

[37]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "Testing" Phenomenon: Not Gone but Nearly Forgotten , 1989 .

[38]  Lnnny L. Jecosy On Interpreting the Effects of Repetition : Solving a Problem Versus Remembering a Solution , 2010 .

[39]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall , 1971 .

[40]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[41]  Philippe C. Duchastel,et al.  Retention of prose following testing with different types of tests , 1981 .

[42]  J. K. Chan,et al.  Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials , 2010, Memory.

[43]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[44]  E. Tulving,et al.  On negative transfer: Effects of testing one list on the recall of another , 1974 .

[45]  P A de Winstanley,et al.  Generation effects and the lack thereof: the role of transfer-appropriate processing. , 1996, Memory.

[46]  M. Ewers,et al.  Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials , 2003, Memory.

[47]  Arthur I. Gates,et al.  Recitation As a Factor in Memorizing , 1917 .

[48]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results , 1992 .

[49]  D. Nowlan,et al.  Costs and benefits. , 1980, Irish medical journal.

[50]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[51]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  Effects of Prior Free Recall Testing on Final Recall and Recognition. , 1971 .

[52]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[53]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[54]  R. Bjork Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[55]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  The testing effect and the retention interval: questions and answers. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[56]  Matthew Jensen Hays,et al.  The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  Patricia A. de Winstanley,et al.  Generation Effects and the Lack Thereof: The Role of Transfer-appropriate Processing , 1996 .