Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: the role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms

Abstract Little research on knowledge-intensive firms has focused specifically on management control issues. This paper aims to consider such issues. Starting from the limitations of the definition of uncertainty, especially when applied to contexts characterised by knowledge intensity, this study investigates the relationship between knowledge complexity and management control systems. This relationship is analysed in the realm of knowledge-intensive firms' teams where it is particularly critical due to the double coordination and knowledge integration role played by management control systems. A field research conducted in three project teams of a software firm supports the relevance of knowledge complexity in explaining the variation of management control systems. The paper concludes with some avenues for future research.

[1]  Gene E. Burton,et al.  The "Clustering Effect" , 1987 .

[2]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[3]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[4]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Organizational control systems in research and development , 1984 .

[5]  Tim Morris,et al.  Organisation and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting , 1998 .

[6]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[7]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Strategy implementation : the role of structure and process , 1978 .

[8]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[9]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[10]  Niall Lothian How companies manage R & D : a survey of major UK companies , 1984 .

[11]  John H. Waterhouse,et al.  A contingency framework for management accounting systems research , 1978 .

[12]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[13]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[14]  D. Hayes,et al.  The contingency theory of managerial accounting : an empirical test of an assessment model , 1975 .

[15]  P. Khandwalla The Effect of Different Types of Competition on the Use of Management Controls , 1972 .

[16]  W. Ouchi,et al.  The Logic of Joint Research and Development , 1988 .

[17]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Economics Of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification And Tacit Knowledge , 2000 .

[18]  Charles F. Gettys,et al.  A partition of small group predecision performance into informational and social components , 1984 .

[19]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Keeping a Butterfly and an Elephant in a House of Cards: The Elements of Exceptional Success , 1993 .

[20]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[22]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Cultural-Ideological Modes of Management Control : A Theory and a Case Study of a Professional Service Company , 1993 .

[23]  Peter Brownell,et al.  Reliance on Accounting Information, Budgetary Participation, and Task Uncertainty: Tests of a Three-Way Interaction , 1986 .

[24]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[25]  M. Abernethy,et al.  The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations , 1995 .

[26]  Florence Vidal Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups , 1973 .

[27]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[28]  I. Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm , 2000 .

[29]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[30]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[31]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  CHANGE IN AN AUTONOMOUS PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION , 1991 .

[32]  Robert A. Simons Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis , 1987 .

[33]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .

[34]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  A spiral model of software development and enhancement , 1986, Computer.

[35]  R. Nelson,et al.  Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm , 1988 .

[36]  Peter. Brownell Budgetary Systems And The Control Of Functionally Differentiated Organizational Activities , 1985 .

[37]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[38]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[39]  A. Hare,et al.  Handbook of small group research , 1962 .

[40]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[41]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[42]  O. Williamson Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory , 1993 .

[43]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  Impacts of life cycle models on software configuration management , 1991, CACM.

[44]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[45]  Joseph A. Raelin,et al.  The basis for the professional's resistance to managerial control , 1985 .

[46]  Eskil Ekstedt,et al.  Knowledge renewal and knowledge companies , 1989 .

[47]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[48]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of control in the Big Six☆ , 1997 .

[49]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice , 1997 .

[50]  A. Grandori An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes , 1997 .

[51]  Thomas W. Scott,et al.  Performance measurement and managerial teams , 1999 .

[52]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Sedimentation and Transformation in Organizational Change: The Case of Canadian Law Firms , 1996 .

[53]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[54]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[55]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[56]  Andy Neely,et al.  Business performance measurement: Performance measurement – practical applications , 2002 .

[57]  E. Smigel,et al.  The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man , 1966 .

[58]  M. E. Shaw Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[59]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  An empirical analysis of the expenditure budget in research and development , 1988 .

[60]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[61]  R. Greenwood,et al.  “P2-Form” Strategic Management: Corporate Practices in Professional Partnerships , 1990 .

[62]  D. Teece Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 2004 .

[63]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[64]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[65]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[66]  Tony Davila,et al.  An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development , 2000 .

[67]  R. Chenhall Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[68]  V. G. Ouchi,et al.  A conceptual framework for the design and organizational control mechanisms , 1979 .

[69]  W BoehmBarry A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement , 1988 .

[70]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation , 1984 .

[71]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[72]  C. B. Schoonhoven Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[73]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[74]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational learning: debates past, present and future , 2000 .

[75]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[76]  Max Boisot,et al.  Is your firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategies of firms , 1995 .

[77]  Jacob G. Birnberg Discussion of “An empirical analysis of the expenditure budget in research and development”* , 1988 .

[78]  M. Alvesson Management Of Knowledge-Intensive Companies , 1995 .

[79]  D. Maister Managing the Professional Service Firm , 1997 .

[80]  Paul Rook,et al.  Controlling software projects , 1986, Softw. Eng. J..

[81]  Malcolm Smith,et al.  Research Methods in Accounting , 2003 .

[82]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[83]  R. Grant The Knowledge-Based View of the Firm , 2006 .

[84]  Morris H. Stocks,et al.  The impact of an increase in accounting information level on the judgment quality of individuals and groups , 1995 .

[85]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[86]  M. Alvesson Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies , 2000 .

[87]  G. Winch,et al.  MANAGING THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION: THE CASE OF ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE , 1993 .

[88]  Rob Austin,et al.  Business performance measurement: The future of performance measurement: Measuring knowledge work , 2002 .

[89]  R. Nelson Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[90]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[91]  D. Otley The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis , 1980 .

[92]  Alan S. Dunk,et al.  TASK UNCERTAINTY AND ITS INTERACTION WITH BUDGETARY PARTICIPATION AND BUDGET EMPHASIS: SOME... , 1991 .

[93]  Raimo Nurmi,et al.  Knowledge-intensive firms , 1998 .

[94]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A critical review☆ , 1997 .

[95]  M. Dodgson Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[96]  M. Hirst,et al.  The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation , 1990 .

[97]  C. Perrow Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1970 .

[98]  R. Yin Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[99]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[100]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[101]  Neil M. Kay,et al.  The Innovating Firm , 1979 .

[102]  Zubaidah Ismail,et al.  The impact of the review process in hypothesis generation tasks , 1995 .

[103]  M. Hirst RELIANCE ON ACCOUNTING PERFORMANCE-MEASURES, TASK UNCERTAINTY, AND DYSFUNCTIONAL BEHAVIOR - SOME EXTENSIONS , 1983 .

[104]  Bill Nixon,et al.  Research and development performance measurement: A case study , 1998 .

[105]  Paul D. Montagna Professionalization and Bureaucratization in Large Professional Organizations , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[106]  Kweku Ewusi-Mensah,et al.  The external organizational environment and its impact on management information systems , 1981 .

[107]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Reviews: Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Max Boisot , 1999 .

[108]  Richard F. Vancil,et al.  Decentralization, managerial ambiguity by design : a research study and report , 1979 .

[109]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Handbook of small group research. 2nd ed. , 1977 .

[110]  A. Lin Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy , 2001 .

[111]  M. Abernethy,et al.  Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls , 1997 .

[112]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[113]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The codification of knowledge: a conceptual and empirical exploration , 2000 .

[114]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[115]  J. B. Kamm,et al.  The balance of innovative behavior and control in new product development , 1980 .

[116]  Christopher S. Chapman,et al.  Reflections on a contingent view of accounting , 1997 .

[117]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  The appropriateness of RAPM: Toward the further development of theory , 2000 .

[118]  K. Merchant Control in business organizations , 1987 .

[119]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of a best-member strategy , 1982 .

[120]  Iain D. Craig The Uk Software Industry: A Survey of the Industry and Evaluation of Policy by Peter C. Grindley Centre for Business Strategy Report Series, London Business School, 87 pages (no index) (£10.00) , 1989, Robotica.