Ultrafast shape recognition: evaluating a new ligand-based virtual screening technology.

Large scale database searching to identify molecules that share a common biological activity for a target of interest is widely used in drug discovery. Such an endeavour requires the availability of a method encoding molecular properties that are indicative of biological activity and at least one active molecule to be used as a template. Molecular shape has been shown to be an important indicator of biological activity; however, currently used methods are relatively slow, so faster and more reliable methods are highly desirable. Recently, a new non-superposition based method for molecular shape comparison, called Ultrafast Shape Recognition (USR), has been devised with computational performance at least three orders of magnitude faster than previously existing methods. In this study, we investigate the performance of USR in retrieving biologically active compounds through retrospective Virtual Screening experiments. Results show that USR performs better on average than a commercially available shape similarity method, while screening conformers at a rate that is more than 2500 times faster. This outstanding computational performance is particularly useful for searching much larger portions of chemical space than previously possible, which makes USR a very valuable new tool in the search for new lead molecules for drug discovery programs.

[1]  Pedro J. Ballester,et al.  Ultrafast shape recognition for similarity search in molecular databases , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Guillermo Moyna,et al.  Shape signatures: a new approach to computer-aided ligand- and receptor-based drug design. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  W. G. Richards,et al.  Rapid evaluation of shape similarity using Gaussian functions , 1993, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Andreas Bender,et al.  A Discussion of Measures of Enrichment in Virtual Screening: Comparing the Information Content of Descriptors with Increasing Levels of Sophistication , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Virtual Exploration of the Chemical Universe up to 11 Atoms of C, N, O, F: Assembly of 26.4 Million Structures (110.9 Million Stereoisomers) and Analysis for New Ring Systems, Stereochemistry, Physicochemical Properties, Compound Classes, and Drug Discovery , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  W L Jorgensen,et al.  Rusting of the lock and key model for protein-ligand binding. , 1991, Science.

[9]  W. Graham Richards,et al.  Similarity of molecular shape , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[10]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[11]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  Variable selection and model validation of 2D and 3D molecular descriptors> , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[13]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Comparison of Topological, Shape, and Docking Methods in Virtual Screening. , 2007 .

[14]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  Irwin D. Kuntz,et al.  A fast and efficient method for 2D and 3D molecular shape description , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[16]  Florian Nigsch,et al.  A novel hybrid ultrafast shape descriptor method for use in virtual screening , 2008, Chemistry Central journal.

[17]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  W. Graham Richards,et al.  Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Paola Gratteri,et al.  Field interaction and geometrical overlap: a new simplex and experimental design based computational procedure for superposing small ligand molecules. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Harold Soh,et al.  Multiscale approach to explore the potential energy surface of water clusters (H2O)nn , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[21]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 Daltons. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..