The Community-Engaged Lab: A Case-Study Introduction for Developmental Science

Due to the closing of campuses, museums, and other public spaces during the pandemic, the typical avenues for recruitment, partnership, and dissemination are now unavailable to developmental labs. In this paper, we show how a shift in perspective has impacted our lab's ability to successfully transition to virtual work during the COVID-19 shut-down. This begins by recognizing that any lab that relies on local communities to engage in human research is itself a community organization. From this, we introduce a community-engaged lab model, and explain how it works using our own activities during the pandemic as an example. To begin, we introduce the vocabulary of mission-driven community organizations and show how we applied the key ideas of mission, vision, and culture to discussions of our own lab's identity. We contrast the community-engaged lab model with a traditional bi-directional model of recruitment from and dissemination to communities and describe how the community-engaged model can be used to reframe these and other ordinary lab activities. Our activities during the pandemic serve as a case study: we formed new community partnerships, engaged with child “citizen-scientists” in online research, and opened new avenues of virtual programming. One year later, we see modest but quantifiable impact of this approach: a return to pre-pandemic diversity in our samples, new engagement opportunities for trainees, and new sustainable partnerships. We end by discussing the promise and limitations of the community-engaged lab model for the future of developmental research.

[1]  S. Sonnenschein,et al.  Home Learning Environments for Young Children in the U.S. During COVID-19 , 2021, Early Education and Development.

[2]  K. Fu,et al.  Vulnerability and resilience in children during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[3]  Rashmita S. Mistry,et al.  Child Development During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Through a Life Course Theory Lens , 2020, Child development perspectives.

[4]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Online Developmental Science to Foster Innovation, Access, and Impact , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Y. Bao,et al.  Brief Report: Increased Addictive Internet and Substance Use Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in China , 2020, The American journal on addictions.

[6]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  No Participant Left Behind: Conducting Science During COVID-19 , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Susan M. Letourneau,et al.  Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums. , 2020, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[8]  Joscha Kärtner,et al.  The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. , 2017, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[10]  David Sobel,et al.  Cognitive Development in Museum Settings : Relating Research and Practice , 2015 .

[11]  James B. Avey,et al.  Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes , 2009, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[12]  Heather M. Grant,et al.  Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits , 2007 .

[13]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Friendship moderates prospective associations between social isolation and adjustment problems in young children. , 2007, Child development.

[14]  Richard Medlin Home Schooling and the Question of Socialization , 2000 .

[15]  SARAh L. ASh,et al.  Generating, Deepening, and Documenting Learning: The Power of Critical Reflection in Applied Learning , 2009, Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education.

[16]  John P. Kretzman,et al.  Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets , 1993 .