Inverse design of nonlinearity in energy harvesters for optimum damping

This paper presents the inverse design method for the nonlinearity in an energy harvester in order to achieve an optimum damping. A single degree-of-freedom electro-mechanical oscillator is considered as an energy harvester, which is subjected to a harmonic base excitation. The harvester has a limited throw due to the physical constraint of the device, which means that the amplitude of the relative displacement between the mass of the harvester and the base cannot exceed a threshold when the device is driven at resonance and beyond a particular amplitude. This physical constraint requires the damping of the harvester to be adjusted for different excitation amplitudes, such that the relative displacement is controlled and maintained below the limit. For example, the damping can be increased to reduce the amplitude of the relative displacement. For high excitation amplitudes, the optimum damping is, therefore, dependent on the amplitude of the base excitation, and can be synthesised by a nonlinear function. In this paper, a nonlinear function in the form of a bilinear is considered to represent the damping model of the device. A numerical optimisation using Matlab is carried out to fit a curve to the amplitude-dependent damping in order to determine the optimum bilinear model. The nonlinear damping is then used in the time-domain simulations and the relative displacement and the average harvested power are obtained. It is demonstrated that the proposed nonlinear damping can maintain the relative displacement of the harvester at its maximum level for a wide range of excitation, therefore providing the optimum condition for power harvesting.

[1]  Cecilia Surace,et al.  On the Non-Linear Characteristics of Automotive Shock Absorbers , 1992 .

[2]  N. G. Stephen,et al.  On energy harvesting from ambient vibration , 2006 .

[3]  S. M. García,et al.  2014: , 2020, A Party for Lazarus.

[4]  Pramodita Sharma 2012 , 2013, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[5]  U. Ingard,et al.  Acoustic Nonlinearity of an Orifice , 1967 .

[6]  Thomas Wilson,et al.  WING BOX NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL DAMPING , 2011 .

[7]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  Extending the dynamic range of an energy harvester using nonlinear damping , 2014 .

[8]  John E. Gibson,et al.  Nonlinear Automatic Control , 1963 .

[9]  M. Ghandchi Tehrani,et al.  Nonlinear damping and quasi-linear modelling , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Jörg Wallaschek,et al.  Dynamics of non-linear automobile shock-absorbers , 1990 .

[11]  Zi-Qiang Lang,et al.  Application of non-linear damping to vibration isolation: an experimental study , 2012 .

[13]  J. Chaste,et al.  Nonlinear damping in mechanical resonators made from carbon nanotubes and graphene. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.