Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation

A policy question was posed in 2001 to Canadian publics: should Canada proceed with clinical trials on xenotransplantation and if so, under what conditions? As part of its development of policy and regulations on this medical technology, Health Canada and the Canadian Public Health Association implemented a public consultation process that included a public opinion survey and deliberative citizen fora modeled along the citizens' jury. This study focuses on the citizen fora and describes an assessment of effectiveness based on an evaluation framework developed on the basis of concepts from constructive technology assessment and deliberative democracy.

[1]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[2]  Ned Crosby,et al.  Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[4]  G. Pask Conversation, Cognition and Learning , 1975 .

[5]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Constructive Technology Assessment: A New Paradigm for Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[6]  E. Einsiedel,et al.  Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel J. Fiorino Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[8]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[9]  David H. Guston,et al.  Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy , 1999 .

[10]  Lynne Outhred,et al.  An evaluation of the , 2001 .

[11]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[12]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[13]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .

[14]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[15]  James R. Wright Alternative interpretations of the same data: flaws in the process of consulting the Canadian public about xenotransplantation issues. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.