Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Engel. Thought and Language , 1964 .
[2] Ned Crosby,et al. Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions , 1995 .
[3] Thomas J. Misa,et al. Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .
[4] G. Pask. Conversation, Cognition and Learning , 1975 .
[5] Thomas J. Misa,et al. Constructive Technology Assessment: A New Paradigm for Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .
[6] E. Einsiedel,et al. Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy , 2000 .
[7] Daniel J. Fiorino. Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .
[8] A. Rip,et al. The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .
[9] David H. Guston,et al. Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy , 1999 .
[10] Lynne Outhred,et al. An evaluation of the , 2001 .
[11] Thomas J. Misa,et al. Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .
[12] J. Habermas. Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .
[13] Thomas Webler,et al. “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .
[14] G. Rowe,et al. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .
[15] James R. Wright. Alternative interpretations of the same data: flaws in the process of consulting the Canadian public about xenotransplantation issues. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.