Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids

Abstract Genetic gains in grain yield and related phenotypic attributes have been extensively documented in maize ( Zea mays L.), but the effect of breeding on the physiological determinants of grain yield is yet poorly understood. We determined genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological traits for seven maize hybrids developed for the central region of Argentina between 1965 and 1997. Gains were expressed as a function of the year of release (YOR). Hybrids were cropped in the field at five stand densities (from almost isolated plants to supra-optimal levels) during two contrasting growing seasons (E 1 and E 2 ). Water and nutrient stress were prevented and pests controlled. Genetic gains in grain yield (≥13.2 g m −2  YOR −1 ) were mainly associated with improved kernel number, enhanced postsilking biomass production, and enhanced biomass allocation to reproductive sinks, but computed gains were affected by the environment. Differences among hybrids arose at the start of the critical period, and were evident as improved mean radiation use efficiency (≥0.026 g MJ −1  YOR −1 ), enhanced plant growth rate at near optimum stand density (≥0.04 g pl −1  YOR −1 ), and improved biomass partitioning to the ear around silking (0.0034 YOR −1 , only for E 1 ). Improved biomass production after silking was related to an increased light interception (≥4.7 MJ m −2  YOR −1 ), and allowed for an almost constant source–sink ratio during grain filling. This trend determined no trade-off between kernel number and kernel weight. In contrast to previous studies, genetic gains were detected for potential productivity (e.g., maximum grain yield) on a per plant basis (i.e., under no resource competition), a promising aspect for the improvement of crop grain yield potential.

[1]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize , 1989 .

[2]  D. W. Stewart,et al.  Ear and Kernel Formation in Maize Hybrids Representing Three Decades of Grain Yield Improvement in Ontario , 1992 .

[3]  C. Rampazzo,et al.  Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density , 2002 .

[4]  J. Monteith.  Radiation and Crops , 1965, Experimental Agriculture.

[5]  María E. Otegui,et al.  Maize Kernel Weight Response to Postflowering Source–Sink Ratio , 2001 .

[6]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Row Spacing Effects on Light Extinction Coefficients of Corn, Sorghum, Soybean, and Sunflower , 1996 .

[7]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Temperature and Crop Development , 1991 .

[8]  Victor O. Sadras,et al.  Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1993 , 2000 .

[9]  W. A. Russell,et al.  Genetic improvement of maize yields , 1991 .

[10]  S. Koutroubas,et al.  A review of maize hybrids' dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability , 2004 .

[11]  J. R. Dunlap,et al.  Yield response of two cycles of selection from a semiprolific early maize (Zea mays L.) population to plant density, sucrose infusion and pollination control , 1998 .

[12]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency of an Old and a New Maize Hybrid , 1992 .

[13]  L. M. Dwyer,et al.  Mathematical Characterization of Leaf Shape and Area of Maize Hybrids , 1999 .

[14]  G. Slafer,et al.  Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal , 2004 .

[15]  C. J. Pearson,et al.  Field crop ecosystems. , 1992 .

[16]  J. Somsen,et al.  Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US corn belt: Radiation-use efficiency and grain yield , 1997 .

[17]  J. Hanway.  How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[18]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Kernel Number Determination in Argentinean Maize Hybrids Released between 1965 and 1993 , 2004 .

[19]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[20]  Claudio M. Ghersa,et al.  Field-crop systems of the Pampas , 1992 .

[21]  D. Duvick,et al.  Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States , 1999 .

[22]  Robert G. D. Steel,et al.  Bioestadística : principios y procedimientos , 1985 .

[23]  Mark E. Westgate,et al.  Synchronous pollination within and between ears improves kernel set in maize , 2000 .

[24]  Fernando H. Andrade.  Ecofisiología del cultivo de maíz , 1996 .

[25]  F. Andrade,et al.  Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993 , 2003 .

[26]  C. S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Techniques for Measuring Intercepted and Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Corn Canopies1 , 1986 .

[27]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior , 1993 .

[28]  D. W. Stewart,et al.  Changes in plant density dependence of leaf photosynthesis of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids, 1959 to 1988 , 1991 .

[29]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize , 2002 .

[30]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization , 1993 .

[31]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Genetic Improvement in Grain Yield of Commercial Maize Hybrids Grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988 , 1989 .

[32]  M. Otegui,et al.  Modeling hybrid and sowing date effects on potential grain yield of maize in a humid temperate region , 1996 .