Cell-ECM traction force modulates endogenous tension at cell–cell contacts

Cells in tissues are mechanically coupled both to the ECM and neighboring cells, but the coordination and interdependency of forces sustained at cell-ECM and cell–cell adhesions are unknown. In this paper, we demonstrate that the endogenous force sustained at the cell–cell contact between a pair of epithelial cells is approximately 100 nN, directed perpendicular to the cell–cell interface and concentrated at the contact edges. This force is stably maintained over time despite significant fluctuations in cell–cell contact length and cell morphology. A direct relationship between the total cellular traction force on the ECM and the endogenous cell–cell force exists, indicating that the cell–cell tension is a constant fraction of the cell-ECM traction. Thus, modulation of ECM properties that impact cell-ECM traction alters cell–cell tension. Finally, we show in a minimal model of a tissue that all cells experience similar forces from the surrounding microenvironment, despite differences in the extent of cell-ECM and cell–cell adhesion. This interdependence of cell–cell and cell-ECM forces has significant implications for the maintenance of the mechanical integrity of tissues, mechanotransduction, and tumor mechanobiology.

[1]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[2]  G. Edwards,et al.  Upregulation of forces and morphogenic asymmetries in dorsal closure during Drosophila development. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Benoit Ladoux,et al.  Cytoskeletal coherence requires myosin-IIA contractility , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Traction forces exerted through N‐cadherin contacts , 2006, Biology of the cell.

[5]  Qi Wen,et al.  The hard life of soft cells. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[6]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[7]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  Samantha J. Stehbens,et al.  Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[10]  W. Nelson,et al.  Localized zones of Rho and Rac activities drive initiation and expansion of epithelial cell–cell adhesion , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Mechanical tugging force regulates the size of cell–cell junctions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Douglas W DeSimone,et al.  Cell adhesion receptors in mechanotransduction. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[16]  Pierre-François Lenne,et al.  Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  G. Edwards,et al.  Forces for Morphogenesis Investigated with Laser Microsurgery and Quantitative Modeling , 2003, Science.

[18]  Joe Tien,et al.  Mechanotransduction at cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[19]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[20]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Physical forces during collective cell migration , 2009 .

[21]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[22]  L. Kam,et al.  Rigidity-dependent cross talk between integrin and cadherin signaling. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[23]  G. Danuser,et al.  Integrin-dependent actomyosin contraction regulates epithelial cell scattering , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Cynthia L. Adams,et al.  Mechanisms of Epithelial Cell–Cell Adhesion and Cell Compaction Revealed by High-resolution Tracking of E-Cadherin– Green Fluorescent Protein , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Jennifer A Zallen,et al.  Myosin II dynamics are regulated by tension in intercalating cells. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[26]  Carl-Philipp Heisenberg,et al.  Biology and Physics of Cell Shape Changes in Development , 2009, Current Biology.

[27]  P. Hersen,et al.  Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Ning Wang,et al.  Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II–dependent manner , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  A. Martínez-Palomo,et al.  Occluding junctions and cytoskeletal components in a cultured transporting epithelium , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  Specificity of Traction Forces to Extracellular Matrix in Smooth Muscle Cells , 2009 .