High‐throughput SNP‐based authentication of human cell lines

Use of false cell lines remains a major problem in biological research. Short tandem repeat (STR) profiling represents the gold standard technique for cell line authentication. However, mismatch repair (MMR)‐deficient cell lines are characterized by microsatellite instability, which could force allelic drifts in combination with a selective outgrowth of otherwise persisting side lines, and, thus, are likely to be misclassified by STR profiling. On the basis of the high‐throughput Luminex platform, we developed a 24‐plex single nucleotide polymorphism profiling assay, called multiplex cell authentication (MCA), for determining authentication of human cell lines. MCA was evaluated by analyzing a collection of 436 human cell lines from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, previously characterized by eight‐loci STR profiling. Both assays showed a very high degree of concordance and similar average matching probabilities (∼1 × 10−8 for STR profiling and ∼1 × 10−9 for MCA). MCA enabled the detection of less than 3% of contaminating human cells. By analyzing MMR‐deficient cell lines, evidence was obtained for a higher robustness of the MCA compared to STR profiling. In conclusion, MCA could complement routine cell line authentication and replace the standard authentication STR technique in case of MSI cell lines.

[1]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[2]  M. Pawlita,et al.  Homogeneous Amplification of Genital Human Alpha Papillomaviruses by PCR Using Novel Broad-Spectrum GP5+ and GP6+ Primers , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Amanda Capes-Davis,et al.  Check your cultures! A list of cross‐contaminated or misidentified cell lines , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[4]  M. Pawlita,et al.  High-throughput detection and multiplex identification of cell contaminations , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  R. Freshney Database of misidentified cell lines , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[6]  J A Thomson,et al.  Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P M Schneider,et al.  Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  Paula Chaves,et al.  Verification and unmasking of widely used human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  K. Kidd,et al.  Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[10]  Niels Morling,et al.  Forensic validation of the SNPforID 52-plex assay. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  J. A. Taylor,et al.  Development and population study of an eight-locus short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex system. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Forensically relevant SNP classes. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[13]  R. Wooster The cancer genome project , 2002 .

[14]  Stefan Schmidt,et al.  Cancer cell line identification by short tandem repeat profiling: power and limitations , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  P. Hainaut,et al.  Mistaken identity of widely used esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line TE-7. , 2007, Cancer research.

[16]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Association of HLA‐DRB1, interleukin‐6 and cyclin D1 polymorphisms with cervical cancer in the Swedish population—A candidate gene approach , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[17]  H. Drexler,et al.  Short tandem repeat DNA typing provides an international reference standard for authentication of human cell lines. , 2005, ALTEX.

[18]  Levi Garraway,et al.  SNP panel identification assay (SPIA): a genetic-based assay for the identification of cell lines , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Toshihiro Tanaka The International HapMap Project , 2003, Nature.

[20]  American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Orga ASN-0002 Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  Wilhelm G. Dirks,et al.  Authentication of scientific human cell lines: easy-to-use DNA fingerprinting. , 2005, Methods in molecular biology.

[22]  E. Hoal-van Helden,et al.  Cross-contamination of human esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines detected by DNA fingerprint analysis. , 1988, Cancer research.

[23]  Peter J. F. Snijders,et al.  Bead-Based Multiplex Genotyping of Human Papillomaviruses , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[24]  Y. Matsuo,et al.  False leukemia–lymphoma cell lines: an update on over 500 cell lines , 2003, Leukemia.

[25]  A. Maitra,et al.  A molecular scheme for improved characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines , 2006, BMC Biology.

[26]  Kenneth K. Kidd,et al.  SNPs for a universal individual identification panel , 2010, Human Genetics.

[27]  Masters,et al.  Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end , 2010 .