Distance decay in spectral space in analysing ecosystem β‐diversity

The use of spectral distance for explaining the phenomenon of distance decay in species similarity between two sites (based on the niche difference model) is presented here. Distance decay is based on the first law of geography: ‘the similarity between two sites decays with increasing the distance between them’. From an ecological point of view, this could be expressed as: ‘the β‐diversity between two sites should increase with an increase in spatial distance’. Beta‐diversity is defined as the amount of turnover in species composition from one site to another; and it plays a key role in biodiversity management and conservation, as it allows the detection of spatial gradients that act functionally in determining the spatial variation in species composition. This work demonstrates how the celebrated distance decay pattern achieved by means of spatial distance can be attained even with spectral distance, measured on Landsat near‐infrared images. It is argued that spectral heterogeneity represents a good proxy of β‐diversity of an area, becoming a valuable tool in biodiversity characterization at regional and global scales.

[1]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[2]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[3]  H. Nagendra Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity , 2001 .

[4]  S. Loppi,et al.  Epiphytic lichens as sentinels for heavy metal pollution at forest ecosystems (central Italy). , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[5]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Testing the spectral variation hypothesis by using satellite multispectral images , 2004 .

[6]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[7]  G. B. Groom,et al.  The integration of field survey and remote sensing for biodiversity assessment: a case study in the tropical forests and wetlands of Sango Bay, Uganda , 1998 .

[8]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[9]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[10]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[11]  Alessandro Chiarucci,et al.  Quantitative floristics as a tool for the assessment of plant diversity in Tuscan forests , 2005 .

[12]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[13]  Thomas Wohlgemuth,et al.  Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists , 2002 .

[14]  Maria Laura Carranza,et al.  Computing β-diversity from species-area curves , 2002 .

[15]  Hans Estrup Andersen,et al.  Rejecting the mean: Estimating the response of fen plant species to environmental factors by non-linear quantile regression , 2005 .

[16]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[17]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Interannual variability of NDVI and species richness in Kenya , 2002 .

[18]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[19]  M. Abrams,et al.  USE OF BOUNDARY-LINE GROWTH PATTERNS AS A BASIS FOR DENDROECOLOGICAL RELEASE CRITERIA , 2003 .

[20]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  LINKING FLORISTIC PATTERNS WITH SOIL HETEROGENEITY AND SATELLITE IMAGERY IN ECUADORIAN AMAZONIA , 2003 .

[21]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[22]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[23]  Oliver L. Phillips,et al.  Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape‐scale approach , 2003 .

[24]  M. Palmer,et al.  Distance decay in an old-growth neotropical forest , 2005 .

[25]  J. Diamond,et al.  Factors controlling species diversity: overview and synthesis , 1988 .

[26]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Tree biodiversity in protected and logged Bornean tropical rain forests and its measurement by satellite remote sensing , 2003 .

[27]  R. Poulin The decay of similarity with geographical distance in parasite communities of vertebrate hosts , 2003 .

[28]  U. Schmidt,et al.  Using a boundary line approach to analyze N2O flux data from agricultural soils , 2000, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[29]  W. Gould REMOTE SENSING OF VEGETATION, PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS, AND REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS , 2000 .

[30]  R. Ponce-Hernandez,et al.  Mapping the spatial distribution of plant diversity indices in a tropical forest using multi-spectral satellite image classification and field measurements , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[31]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[32]  Christopher Small,et al.  The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space , 2004 .

[33]  P. White,et al.  Scale Dependence and the Species-Area Relationship , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Maximizing plant species inventory efficiency by means of remotely sensed spectral distances , 2005 .

[35]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data , 2003 .

[36]  R. Macarthur PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1965 .

[37]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  Using coarse scale forest variables as ancillary information and weighting of variables in k-NN estimation: a genetic algorithm approach , 2004 .

[38]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[39]  A. Chiarucci,et al.  Structure and floristic diversity in permanent monitoring plots in forest ecosystems of Tuscany , 2001 .