Making VCG More Robust in Combinatorial Auctions via Submodular Approximation

The Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) protocol is a theoretically well-founded protocol that can be used for combinatorial auctions. However, the VCG has several limitations such as (a) vulnerability to false-name bids, (b) vulnerability to loser collusion, and (c) the outcome is not in the core. Yokoo, Matsutani, & Iwasaki (2006) presented a new combinatorial auction protocol called the Groves Mechanism with SubModular Approximation (GM-SMA). This protocol satisfies the following characteristics: (1) it is false-name-proof, (2) each winner is included in a Pareto efficient allocation, and (3) as long as a Pareto efficient allocation is achieved, the protocol is robust against the collusion of losers and the outcome is in the core. The GM-SMA is the first protocol that satisfies all three of these characteristics. The basic ideas of the GM-SMA are as follows: (i) it is based on the VCG protocol, i.e., the payment of a winner in this protocol is identical to the payment in one instance of the Groves mechanism, which is a class of protocols that includes the VCG, (ii) when calculating the payment of a bidder, we approximate the valuations of other bidders by using a submodular valuation function (submodular approximation). This paper shows a high-level presentation of the GM-SMA protocol. and discusses open problems and the relationship to other works in AI.

[1]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Taming the Computational Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions: Optimal and Approximate Approaches , 1999, IJCAI.

[2]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Solutions manual for Microeconomic theory : Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green , 1997 .

[3]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Robust Combinatorial Auction Protocol against False-Name Bids , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[4]  Anna R. Karlin,et al.  Beyond VCG: frugality of truthful mechanisms , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[5]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  GROVES' SCHEME ON RESTRICTED DOMAINS , 1979 .

[6]  Sven de Vries,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions: A Survey , 2003, INFORMS J. Comput..

[7]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  False-name-proof combinatorial auction protocol: Groves Mechanism with SubModular Approximation , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[8]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[9]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[10]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[11]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions , 2002, EC '99.

[12]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[13]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding , 2002 .

[14]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: new fraud in internet auctions , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[16]  W. K. Vickery,et al.  Counter-Speculation Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .