Logit Dynamics with Concurrent Updates for Local Interaction Potential Games

Logit choice dynamics constitute a family of randomized best response dynamics based on the logit choice function (McFadden in Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, 1974) that models players with limited rationality and knowledge. In this paper we study the all-logit dynamics [also known as simultaneous learning (Alós-Ferrer and Netzer in Games Econ Behav 68(2):413–427, 2010)], where at each time step all players concurrently update their strategies according to the logit choice function. In the well studied (one-)logit dynamics (Blume in Games Econ Behav 5(3):387–424, 1993) instead at each step only one randomly chosen player is allowed to update. We study properties of the all-logit dynamics in the context of local interaction potential games, a class of games that has been used to model complex social phenomena (Montanari and Saberi 2009; Peyton in The economy as a complex evolving system. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003) and physical systems (Levin et al. in Probab Theory Relat Fields 146(1–2):223–265, 2010; Martinelli in Lectures on probability theory and statistics. Springer, Berlin, 1999). In a local interaction potential game players are the vertices of a social graph whose edges are two-player potential games. Each player picks one strategy to be played for all the games she is involved in and the payoff of the player is the sum of the payoffs from each of the games. We prove that local interaction potential games characterize the class of games for which the all-logit dynamics is reversible. We then compare the stationary behavior of one-logit and all-logit dynamics. Specifically, we look at the expected value of a notable class of observables, that we call decomposable observables. We prove that the difference between the expected values of the observables at stationarity for the two dynamics depends only on the rationality level $$\beta $$β and on the distance of the social graph from a bipartite graph. In particular, if the social graph is bipartite then decomposable observables have the same expected value. Finally, we show that the mixing time of the all-logit dynamics has the same twofold behavior that has been highlighted in the case of the one-logit: for some games it exponentially depends on the rationality level $$\beta $$β, whereas for other games it can be upper bounded by a function independent from $$\beta $$β.

[1]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  The Theory of Learning in Games , 1998 .

[2]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Population Games And Evolutionary Dynamics , 2010, Economic learning and social evolution.

[3]  Luca Trevisan,et al.  Max cut and the smallest eigenvalue , 2008, STOC '09.

[4]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[5]  Elizabeth L. Wilmer,et al.  Markov Chains and Mixing Times , 2008 .

[6]  Christian Borgs,et al.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to Affiliation Networks: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2010, ICS.

[7]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Glauber dynamics on trees and hyperbolic graphs , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[8]  E. Young Contagion , 2015, New Scientist.

[9]  L. Shapley,et al.  REGULAR ARTICLEPotential Games , 1996 .

[10]  Nick Netzer,et al.  Robust stochastic stability , 2014 .

[11]  S. Hart,et al.  A General Class of Adaptive Strategies , 1999 .

[12]  Christian Borgs,et al.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to A-liation Networks: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2011 .

[13]  Paolo Penna,et al.  Convergence to equilibrium of logit dynamics for strategic games , 2011, SPAA.

[14]  J K Goeree,et al.  Stochastic game theory: for playing games, not just for doing theory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Giuseppe Persiano,et al.  Mixing Time and Stationary Expected Social Welfare of Logit Dynamics , 2010, Theory of Computing Systems.

[16]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Near-optimal network design with selfish agents , 2003, STOC '03.

[17]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation , 2000 .

[18]  Harald Niederreiter,et al.  Probability and computing: randomized algorithms and probabilistic analysis , 2006, Math. Comput..

[19]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[20]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks , 2000 .

[21]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Minimum-Effort Coordination Games: Stochastic Potential and Logit Equilibrium , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[22]  Philippe Solal,et al.  A note on control costs and logit rules for strategic games , 2002 .

[23]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[24]  Amin Saberi,et al.  On the Inefficiency Ratio of Stable Equilibria in Congestion Games , 2009, WINE.

[25]  Yakov Babichenko,et al.  Graphical potential games , 2014, J. Econ. Theory.

[26]  Andreu Mas-Colell,et al.  A General Class of Adaptive Strategies , 1999, J. Econ. Theory.

[27]  R. Ravi,et al.  Game-Theoretic Models of Information Overload in Social Networks , 2010, WAW.

[28]  Hans Haller,et al.  Control costs and potential functions for spatial games , 2003, Int. J. Game Theory.

[29]  N. Suh,et al.  Complex Engineered Systems , 2006 .

[30]  Eyton,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks , 2002 .

[31]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  How bad is forming your own opinion? , 2015, Games Econ. Behav..

[32]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[33]  Simon Weidenholzer,et al.  Coordination Games and Local Interactions: A Survey of the Game Theoretic Literature , 2010, Games.

[34]  Nick Netzer,et al.  The logit-response dynamics , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[35]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Общая теория выбора равновесия в играх / A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games , 1989 .

[36]  F. Martinelli Lectures on Glauber dynamics for discrete spin models , 1999 .

[37]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[38]  Scott Shenker,et al.  On a network creation game , 2003, PODC '03.

[39]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[40]  A. A. Cournot Principes de la théorie des richesses , 1863 .

[41]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[42]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Mechanisms for (mis)allocating scientific credit , 2011, STOC '11.

[43]  Y. Peres,et al.  Glauber dynamics for the mean-field Ising model: cut-off, critical power law, and metastability , 2007, 0712.0790.

[44]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Convergence to Equilibrium in Local Interaction Games , 2009, FOCS.

[45]  David C. Parkes,et al.  The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation , 2005, PODC '05.

[46]  P. Moran,et al.  Reversibility and Stochastic Networks , 1980 .

[47]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Information Theory - The Bridge Connecting Bounded Rational Game Theory and Statistical Physics , 2004, ArXiv.