Social Media Activism in Response to the Influence of Political Parody Videos on YouTube

Grounded in scholarship on both the perceptual and behavioral components of the third-person effect, the present experimental study examined the effects of perceived impact of political parody videos on self and on others, by varying the perceived intent of the video producer and perceived level of exposure. Building on previous research on the behavioral consequences of such presumed influence, we tested a hierarchical regression model to show how perceived influence on others predicted individuals’ willingness to engage in social media activism (i.e., corrective actions). Results demonstrated that participants in our study showed greater perceived influence of the political parody video when it was presented by a source of highly persuasive intent than by a source of low persuasive intent. Unlike our prediction for the effect of perceived exposure, we did not find the effect of perceived level of exposure on the presumed influence on others. Finally, the results of a hierarchical regression analysis showed that the perception of influence on others was positively associated with participants’ willingness to take a corrective action—the likelihood of engaging in political social media activism.

[1]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[2]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Strategic Voting , 2007, Commun. Res..

[3]  Jody C. Baumgartner Humor on the Next Frontier , 2007 .

[4]  Sung-Yeon Park,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Women’s Desire to Be Thin , 2005, Commun. Res..

[5]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[6]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[7]  Jody C. Baumgartner Polls and Elections: Editorial Cartoons 2.0: The Effects of Digital Political Satire on Presidential Candidate Evaluations , 2008 .

[8]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Behind the Third-Person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other , 2001 .

[9]  Cindy T. Christen,et al.  Media Reach, Media Influence? The Effects of Local, National, and Internet News on Public Opinion Inferences , 2007 .

[10]  Jisu Huh,et al.  Presumed Influence of DTC Prescription Drug Advertising: Do Experts and Novices Think Differently? , 2007, Commun. Res..

[11]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Restricting gambling advertising and the third‐person effect , 2000 .

[12]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  What We Think Others Think , 1991 .

[13]  A. Gunther,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Influence , 2003 .

[14]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics , 1997 .

[15]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  Testing Causal Direction in the Influence of Presumed Media Influence , 2010, Commun. Res..

[16]  Ye Sun,et al.  On the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect , 2008, Commun. Res..

[17]  Ye Sun,et al.  The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment , 2005, Commun. Res..

[18]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[19]  M. Salwen Perceptions of Media Influence and Support for Censorship , 1998 .

[20]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  The First-Person Effect and Its Behavioral Consequences: A New Trend in the Twenty-Five Year History of Third-Person Effect Research , 2008 .

[21]  Joon Soo Lim,et al.  Resistance to Ethically Suspicious Parody Video on YouTube: A Test of Inoculation Theory , 2007 .

[22]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  The Third Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis , 1999 .

[23]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS , 1988 .

[24]  Michel Dupagne,et al.  The Third-Person Effect , 1999 .

[25]  Hernando Rojas “Corrective” Actions in the Public Sphere: How Perceptions of Media and Media Effects Shape Political Behaviors , 2010 .

[26]  J. Lambe,et al.  Understanding Third‐Person Perception Processes: Predicting Perceived Impact on Self and Others for Multiple Expressive Contexts , 2005 .

[27]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary , 1999 .

[28]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  The Persuasive Press Inference , 1998 .

[29]  Simon Chapman,et al.  Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[30]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  Sex, Lies, and Video Compact Disc , 2004, Commun. Res..

[31]  Jisu Huh,et al.  The Third-Person Effect and its Influence on Behavioral Outcomes in a Product Advertising Context: , 2004, Commun. Res..

[32]  Z. Pan,et al.  Understanding the Third‐Person Perception: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[33]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  Exploring a Link Between the Third-Person Effect and the Theory of Reasoned Action , 2008 .

[34]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Susceptibility and Severity , 1999 .

[35]  S. Banning,et al.  Third-Person Effects on Political Participation , 2006 .

[36]  Ran Wei,et al.  Examining the Perceptual Gap and Behavioral Intention in the Perceived Effects of Polling News in the 2008 Taiwan Presidential Election , 2009, Commun. Res..

[37]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Self‐Categorization Explanation for the Third‐Person Effect , 2005 .