The Quality of Electronic Markets

Technical progress in information and communication technologies, increased competition through alternative trading systems, and regulatory actions have significantly changed the trading landscape during the last decade. In this paper, we first provide a conceptual framework to analyze market quality. The framework comprises of external factors, the internal market structure, and specific quantifiable market quality measures. We categorize market quality measures into activity, liquidity, and information. Second, we compare the 1997 IBIS II trading system with the 2009 Xetra system of the Deutsche Boerse Group to exemplary apply our framework. We find that trading strategies have changed, activity has increased, and liquidity has improved for the Xetra system compared to IBIS II. More generally, our case study of the German market shows that, in the context of financial market innovation, the overall market quality has improved over the last couple of years.

[1]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Automating german equity trading: Bid-ask spreads on competing systems , 1993 .

[2]  Dennis Kundisch,et al.  Price efficiency in futures and spot trading: The role of information technology , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[3]  Charles M. Jones,et al.  Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? , 2010 .

[4]  K. Venkataraman,et al.  Automated Versus Floor Trading: An Analysis of Execution Costs on the Paris and New York Exchanges , 2000 .

[5]  L. Harris.  Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners , 2002 .

[6]  E. Theissen.  Floor Versus Screen Trading: Evidence from the German Stock Market , 1999 .

[7]  Terrence Hendershott,et al.  Competition among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks , 2003 .

[8]  E. Clemons,et al.  Information Technology and Screen-Based Securities Trading: Pricing the Stock and Pricing the Trade , 1997 .

[9]  Bruce W. Weber,et al.  Adoption of electronic trading at the International Securities Exchange , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  The defensive use of IT in a newly vulnerable market: The New York Stock Exchange, 1980-2007 , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  Market Microstructure Theory , 1995 .

[12]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  The Impact of IT on Market Information and Transparency: A Unified Theoretical Framework , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Joel Hasbrouck,et al.  Measuring the Information Content of Stock Trades , 1991 .

[14]  Joel Hasbrouck.  The Summary Informativeness of Stock Trades: An Econometric Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  Gideon Saar,et al.  Lifting the Veil: An Analysis of Pre-Trade Transparency at the Nyse , 2003 .

[16]  Fragmentation, Competition and Market Quality: A Post-Mifid Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  Ann C. Logue.  Automated versus Floor Trading: An Analysis of Execution Costs on the Paris and New York Exchanges , 2002 .

[18]  Charles M. C. Lee,et al.  Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data , 1991 .

[19]  Ryan Riordan,et al.  Latency, liquidity and price discovery ☆ , 2012 .

[20]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders , 1985 .

[21]  S. B. Thompson.  Simple Formulas for Standard Errors that Cluster by Both Firm and Time , 2009 .

[22]  Herbert M. Kaufman,et al.  A Comparison of Trade Execution Costs for NYSE and NASDAQ-Listed Stocks , 1997, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[23]  H. Stoll,et al.  Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE , 1996 .