Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention.

Motorists often engage in secondary tasks unrelated to driving that increase cognitive workload, resulting in fatal crashes and injuries. An International Standards Organization method for measuring a driver's cognitive workload, the detection response task (DRT), correlates well with driving outcomes, but investigation of its putative theoretical basis in terms of finite attention capacity remains limited. We address this knowledge gap using evidence-accumulation modeling of simple and choice versions of the DRT in a driving scenario. Our experiments demonstrate how dual-task load affects the parameters of evidence-accumulation models. We found that the cognitive workload induced by a secondary task (counting backward by 3s) reduced the rate of evidence accumulation, consistent with rates being sensitive to limited-capacity attention. We also found a compensatory increase in the amount of evidence required for a response and a small speeding in the time for nondecision processes. The International Standards Organization version of the DRT was found to be most sensitive to cognitive workload. A Wald-distributed evidence-accumulation model augmented with a parameter measuring response omissions provided a parsimonious measure of the underlying causes of cognitive workload in this task. This work demonstrates that evidence-accumulation modeling can accurately represent data produced by cognitive workload measurements, reproduce the data through simulation, and provide supporting evidence for the cognitive processes underlying cognitive workload. Our results provide converging evidence that the DRT method is sensitive to dynamic fluctuations in limited-capacity attention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Understanding the Causes of Adapting, and Failing to Adapt, to Time Pressure in a Complex Multistimulus Environment , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[2]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Validating Two Assessment Strategies for Visual and Cognitive Load in a Simulated Driving Task , 2016 .

[3]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Multinomial Processing Tree Models with Heterogeneity in Participants and Items , 2013, Psychometrika.

[4]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[5]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  SPIDER: A Framework for Understanding Driver Distraction , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Racing to Remember: A Theory of Decision Control in Event-Based Prospective Memory , 2018, Psychological review.

[7]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[8]  Elizabeth N. Mazzae,et al.  Detection Response Task (DRT) Evaluation for Driver Distraction Measurement Application , 2014 .

[9]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[13]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[15]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Extending the Detection Response Task to Simultaneously Measure Cognitive and Visual Task Demands , 2016 .

[16]  M. Marsman,et al.  What can we learn from Plausible Values? , 2016, Psychometrika.

[17]  H. Pashler,et al.  Central Interference in Driving , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  D. Strayer,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. Cognitive Distraction While Multitasking in the Automobile , 2022 .

[19]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Fitting Wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: An example using functions for the S-PLUS package , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[21]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Converging measures of workload capacity , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Dynamic models of choice , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Spencer C. Castro.  How Handheld Mobile Device Size and Hand Location May Affect Divided Attention , 2017 .

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[26]  M. Biernat,et al.  Stereotypes and Shifting Standards: Some Paradoxical Effects of Cognitive Load , 2003 .

[27]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Failures of cognitive control or attention? The case of stop-signal deficits in schizophrenia , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[28]  A K Pradhan,et al.  The view from the road: the contribution of on-road glance-monitoring technologies to understanding driver behavior. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[30]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling simple driving tasks with a one-boundary diffusion model , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[31]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  A flexible and efficient hierarchical Bayesian approach to the exploration of individual differences in cognitive-model-based neuroscience. , 2018 .

[32]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[33]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Dynamic Workload Fluctuations in Driver/Non-Driver Conversational DYADS , 2017 .

[34]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The overconstraint of response time models: Rethinking the scaling problem , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[36]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[37]  A. Gupta,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to , 1997 .

[38]  Thom Baguley,et al.  Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[39]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. , 2014, Psychological review.

[40]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[41]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Slow down and remember to remember! A delay theory of prospective memory costs. , 2015, Psychological review.

[42]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[43]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling one-choice and two-choice driving tasks , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[46]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[48]  D. Strayer,et al.  Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[49]  Jonathon Love,et al.  A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm , 2016, Behavior research methods.

[50]  K. C. Klauer.  Hierarchical Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Latent-Trait Approach , 2006 .

[51]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[52]  T. Dingus,et al.  Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  D. Kahneman.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[54]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[55]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Accumulating Evidence About What Prospective Memory Costs Actually Reveal , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[57]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  An introduction to good practices in cognitive modeling , 2015 .