Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.

UNLABELLED Results from a new PET/CT scanner using lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystals for the PET component are presented. This scanner, which operates in a fully 3-dimensional mode, has a diameter of 90 cm and an axial field of view of 18 cm. It uses 4 x 4 x 22 mm(3) LYSO crystals arranged in a pixelated Anger-logic detector design. This scanner was designed to perform as a high-performance conventional PET scanner as well as provide good timing resolution to operate as a time-of-flight (TOF) PET scanner. METHODS Performance measurements on the scanner were made using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU2-2001 procedures to benchmark its conventional imaging capabilities. The scatter fraction and noise equivalent count (NEC) measurements with the NEMA cylinder (20-cm diameter) were repeated for 2 larger cylinders (27-cm and 35-cm diameter), which better represent average and heavy patients. New measurements were designed to characterize its intrinsic timing resolution capability, which defines its TOF performance. Additional measurements to study the impact of pulse pileup at high counting rates on timing, as well as energy and spatial, resolution were also performed. Finally, to characterize the effect of TOF reconstruction on lesion contrast and noise, the standard NEMA/International Electrotechnical Commission torso phantom as well as a large 35-cm-diameter phantom with both hot and cold spheres were imaged for varying scan times. RESULTS The transverse and axial resolution near the center is 4.8 mm. The absolute sensitivity of this scanner measured with a 70-cm-long line source is 6.6 cps/kBq, whereas scatter fraction is 27% measured with a 70-cm-long line source in a 20-cm-diameter cylinder. For the same line source cylinder, the peak NEC rate is measured to be 125 kcps at an activity concentration of 17.4 kBq/mL (0.47 microCi/mL). The 2 larger cylinders showed a decrease in the peak NEC due to increased attenuation, scatter, and random coincidences, and the peak occurs at lower activity concentrations. The system coincidence timing resolution was measured to be 585 ps. The timing resolution changes as a function of the singles rate due to pulse pileup and could impact TOF image reconstruction. Image-quality measurements with the torso phantom show that very high quality images can be obtained with short scan times (1-2 min per bed position). However, the benefit of TOF is more apparent with the large 35-cm-diameter phantom, where small spheres are detectable only with TOF information for short scan times. CONCLUSION The Gemini TF whole-body scanner represents the first commercially available fully 3-dimensional PET scanner that achieves TOF capability as well as conventional imaging capabilities. The timing resolution is also stable over a long duration, indicating the practicality of this device. Excellent image quality is achieved for whole-body studies in 10-30 min, depending on patient size. The most significant improvement with TOF is seen for the heaviest patients.

[1]  T. Tomitani Image Reconstruction and Noise Evaluation in Photon Time-of-Flight Assisted Positron Emission Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  T. Budinger Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  P. Grangeat,et al.  Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine , 1996, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[5]  Samuel Matej,et al.  Performance of a Fast Maximum Likelihood Algorithm for Fully 3D PET Reconstruction , 1996 .

[6]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Time-of-flight PET. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[8]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Optimizing the performance of a PET detector using discrete GSO crystals on a continuous lightguide , 1999 .

[9]  Samuel Matej,et al.  3D-FRP: direct Fourier reconstruction with Fourier reprojection for fully 3-D PET , 2000 .

[10]  S. Surti,et al.  A multiscanner evaluation of PET image quality using phantom studies , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[11]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Performance of a brain PET camera based on anger-logic gadolinium oxyorthosilicate detectors. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  S. Matej,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction using geometrically ordered subsets with list-mode data , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[13]  Charles C. Watson,et al.  CHAPTER 11 – PET/CT Systems , 2004 .

[14]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  M. Partridge,et al.  Performance evaluation of the Philips 'Gemini' PET/CT System , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[16]  Joel S Karp,et al.  Optimization of a fully 3D single scatter simulation algorithm for 3D PET. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Design of a lanthanum bromide detector for time-of-flight PET , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  S. Surti,et al.  Count-rate dependent event mispositioning and NEC in PET , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  L.M. Popescu,et al.  Ray tracing through a grid of blobs , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[21]  M. Conti Effect of randoms on signal-to-noise-ratio in TOF PET , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[22]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners , 1991, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  M. Partridge,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Philips “Gemini” PET/CT System , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[24]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Time-of-flight quality control for a new Philips Gemini PET/CT scanner , 2006 .

[25]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-DPET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  C. Watson Extension of Single Scatter Simulation to Scatter Correction of Time-of-Flight PET , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.