The Activity-Entity-Impact Method: Understanding Bottleneck Behavior of Simulation Models Demonstrated by an Emergency Department Model

Simulation models are often used to gain a better understanding of a system’s sensitivity to changes in the input parameters. Data gathered during simulation runs is aggregated to Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that allow one to assess a model’s or system’s performance. KPIs do not provide a deeper understanding of the causes of the observed output because this is not their primary objective. By contrast, dynamic bottleneck methods both identify elements that yield the largest gain in productivity with increased availability and also visualize these elements over time to enable bottlenecks to be better understood. In this paper we discuss whether dynamic bottleneck detection methods can be utilized to identify, measure, and visualize causes of observed behavior in complex models. We extend standard bottleneck detection methods, and introduce the Activity-Entity-Impact-Method. The practicality of the method is demonstrated by an example model of a typical Emergency Department setting.

[1]  Oualid Jouini,et al.  A comprehensive simulation modeling of an emergency department: A case study for simulation optimization of staffing levels , 2014, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014.

[2]  Dietmar Neubacher,et al.  HCDESLib - A Generic Open Source Toolkit for Health Care Simulation , 2016 .

[3]  Minoru Tanaka,et al.  A practical bottleneck detection method , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[4]  Dietmar Neubacher,et al.  GEDMod - Towards a generic toolkit for emergency department modeling , 2018, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[5]  Russell C. H. Cheng,et al.  A practical introduction to analysis of simulation output data , 2013, WSC 2013.

[6]  Theodore Eugene Day,et al.  Decreased length of stay after addition of healthcare provider in emergency department triage: a comparison between computer-simulated and real-world interventions , 2012, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[7]  F. P. Wieland,et al.  UNDERSTANDING ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE USING SIMULATION , 2006 .

[8]  Masaru Nakano,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of Bottleneck Detection Methods in Manufacturing Systems with Particular Consideration for Shifting Bottlenecks , 2015, APMS.

[9]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Statistical analysis of simulation output data: the practical state of the art , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[10]  Amr Arisha,et al.  Simulation-based framework to improve patient experience in an emergency department , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Understanding Accident and Emergency Department Performance using Simulation , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[12]  Stephan Biller,et al.  Supervisory Factory Control Based on Real-Time Production Feedback , 2007 .

[13]  Simon Lidberg,et al.  Discrete Event Simulation Output Data-Handling System in an Automotive Manufacturing Plant , 2018 .

[14]  D. J. Morrice,et al.  COMPARISON OF BOTTLENECK DETECTION METHODS FOR AGV SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[15]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Simulating an emergency department: the importance of modeling the interactions between physicians and delegates in a discrete event simulation , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[16]  Russell C. H. Cheng,et al.  A practical introduction to analysis of simulation output data , 2013, 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[17]  Dietmar Neubacher,et al.  A conceptual modeling framework for discrete event simulation using hierarchical control structures , 2015, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.