Development of an Instrument to Measure Perspectives of Engineering Education Among College Students

The number of engineering students has been declining for decades and attracting qualified students has become an urgent task for engineering schools in The United States. Perspectives students hold towards engineering play an important role in their college major selection. An effective standardized instrument measuring general perspectives about engineering among college students is designed in this project and survey development, instrument administration, and factor analysis are presented. The statistical analysis reveals that college students in general agree that engineering is beneficial to the society; however, they tend to believe that it takes too much effort to gain an engineering degree and that engineering is a demanding career. Further, they are neutral about the personal benefits of pursuing a degree in engineering, and finally, they do not feel that studying engineering or making engineering as their profession is particularly interesting. These findings provide a good explanation to the declining enrollment and increasing dropout rates in engineering schools in the United States.

[1]  W F Velicer,et al.  Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  B. French,et al.  An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students' Success and Persistence , 2005 .

[3]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Engineering Student Attitudes Assessment , 1998 .

[4]  K. Widaman Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters? , 1993, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  J. Burtner The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the Influence of Non‐Cognitive Factors on Engineering School Persistence , 2005 .

[6]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Factors Influencing the Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students , 2006 .

[7]  Henry F. Kaiser,et al.  Coefficient Alpha for a Principal Component and the Kaiser-Guttman Rule , 1991 .

[8]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  The Relation of Early Adolescents’ College Plans and Both Academic Ability and Task-Value Beliefs to Subsequent College Enrollment , 2004 .

[9]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[10]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering , 1997 .

[11]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[12]  N. Lackey,et al.  Making Sense of Factor Analysis , 2003 .

[13]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .