A Multiple-Domain Matrix Support to Capture Rationale for Engineering Design Changes

Design changes are necessary to sustain the product against competition. Due to technical, social, and financial constraints, an organization can only implement a few of many change alternatives. Hence, a wise selection of a change alternative is fundamentally influential for the growth of the organization. Organizations lack knowledge bases to effectively capture rationale for a design change; i.e., identifying the potential effects a design change. In this paper, (1) we propose a knowledge base called multiple-domain matrix that comprises the relationships among different parameters that are building blocks of a product and its manufacturing system. (2) Using the indirect change propagation method, we capture these relationships to identify the potential effects of a design change. (3) We propose a cost-based metric called change propagation impact (CPI) to quantify the effects that are captured from the multiple-domain matrix. These individual pieces of work are integrated into a web-based tool called Vatram. The tool is deployed in a design environment to evaluate its usefulness and usability.

[1]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[2]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[3]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  A Matrix-Calculation-Based Algorithm for Numerical Change Propagation Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative - Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Idea Inspire 3.0—A Tool for Analogical Design , 2017 .

[6]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[7]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Capturing design rationale , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  J. Temple Black,et al.  The design of the factory with a future , 1991 .

[9]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[12]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems , 2009 .

[13]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting change propagation in complex design , 2004 .

[14]  Simon Szykman,et al.  Enhancing Virtual Product Representations for Advanced Design Repository Systems , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[15]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial Accident Prevention: a Scientific Approach , 1951 .

[16]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  An introduction to the Cambridge advanced modeller , 2010 .

[17]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change impact on a product and its redesign process: a tool for knowledge capture and reuse , 2013 .

[18]  Somwrita Sarkar,et al.  Spectral Characterization of Hierarchical Modularity in Product Architectures. , 2014, Journal of mechanical design.

[19]  Ted S. Ferry,et al.  Modern accident investigation and analysis , 1988 .

[20]  Joseph G. Voelkel,et al.  Guide to Quality Control , 1982 .

[21]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Industrial evaluation of FBS Linkage – a method to support engineering change management , 2015 .

[22]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search , 2014 .

[23]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  DRed and Design Folders: A Way of Capturing, Storing and Passing On Knowledge Generated During Design Projects , 2004, DAC 2004.

[24]  Prabir Sarkar,et al.  A Methodology for Predicting the Effect of Engineering Design Changes , 2017 .

[25]  Riccardo Apreda,et al.  Automatic extraction of function-behaviour-state information from patents , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[26]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Reasons for change propagation: a case study in an automotive OEM , 2012 .

[27]  Steven J. Fenves,et al.  A core product model for representing design information , 2001 .