What do we know about the h index?

Jorge Hirsch (2005a, 2005b) recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.

[1]  A. Raan.  Measuring Science: Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues , 2004 .

[2]  D. Taber,et al.  Quantifying Publication Impact , 2005, Science.

[3]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized h-index for Disclosing Latent Facts in Citation Networks , 2006, ArXiv.

[4]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Simple models and the corresponding h- and g-index , 2006 .

[5]  J. Vanclay.  Refining the H-Index , 2006 .

[6]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  The h Index in Science: A New Measure of Scholarly Contribution , 2006 .

[7]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[8]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientistss: Brief Communication , 2006 .

[9]  Yang Tao,et al.  A Study on Development Planning for Management Science and Engineering , 2006 .

[10]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[11]  Juan E. Iglesias,et al.  Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields , 2006, Scientometrics.

[12]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index , 2006 .

[13]  Yang Li-ying,et al.  Bibliometrical Analysis of Paper's Co-occurrence in Main International Institutions&mdash|A Case Study in Chemical Research , 2006 .

[14]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[15]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[16]  ANTHONY F. J. VAN RAAN,et al.  Sleeping Beauties in science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[17]  Michael G. Banks.  An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds , 2006, Scientometrics.

[18]  W. Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals [1] , 2005 .

[19]  Philip Ball,et al.  Index aims for fair ranking of scientists , 2005, Nature.

[20]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  H-Index for Price Medalists , 2005 .

[21]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  H. Moed.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[23]  M. Jennions,et al.  The h index and career assessment by numbers. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Leo Egghe,et al.  An informetric model for the Hirsch-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[25]  R. Rousseau.  A case study : evolution of JASIS' Hirsch index , 2006 .

[26]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[27]  L. Egghe.  An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .

[28]  S. Cole.  Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists , 1989 .

[29]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants , 2006, Scientometrics.

[30]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[31]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact , 2006, Scientometrics.

[32]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions , 2005, Scientometrics.

[33]  Osame Kinouchi,et al.  Universal Behavior of a Research Productivity Index , 2005 .

[34]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[35]  L. Egghe.  How to improve the h-index , 2006 .

[36]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  New developments related to the Hirsch index , 2006 .

[37]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications , 2005 .

[38]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[40]  Data Point , 2005, Science.

[41]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Measures and Mismeasures of Scientific Quality , 2005 .