Organisational readiness to implement building information modelling: A framework for design consultants in Malysia

Building Information Modelling (BIM) is defined as an approach to building design and construction through modelling technology, associated sets of processes and people to produce, communicate and analyse building information models. The implementation of BIM is expected to improve the delivery of design and construction through 3D visualisation, integrated and automated drawing production, intelligent documentation and information retrieval, consistent data and information, automated conflict detection and automated material take off. Although the potential benefits of BIM are well documented, the implementation process requires proper strategic planning and a thoughtful review of many aspects to realise those benefits. One part of the strategic planning is the readiness assessment where it measures the current position of the organisation as compared to the targeted implementation requirements of the BIM system by using several categories and readiness criteria. Set against the background of the Malaysian construction industry, in the infancy stage of BIM implementation, however has raised the question about the categories and the readiness criteria that should be used to conduct the assessment. The lack of documented BIM implementation in a form of publicly available reports, best practice and guidelines has also escalated the situation. The aim of this research was therefore set to support improvements in the design consultant practice by developing an organisational readiness framework for BIM implementation. The research explored and identified the readiness criteria as the main components of the framework. The research engaged a multiple-case-studies approach and four design consultant companies were selected for the primary data collection. Data from each company was analysed by using content analysis technique before it was cross analysed to determine the pattern of answer. After that, the findings were discussed and theoretically validated to produce a conceptual framework. The conceptual framework was later validated through a focus group workshop to produce the final framework. As the research’s main outcome, the readiness framework consists of four elements. The first readiness element is Process which has three categories residing within it, which are, Process Change Strategy, BIM Implementation Management, and Policy. The second readiness element is Management which includes the categories of Business Strategy, Management Competency, and Leadership. The third element is Technology which also has three categories residing within it, which are Hardware, Technical Support, and Software and the fourth element is People, which has four categories and they are, Roles and Responsibilities, Skill and Attitude, Training and Education and Work Environment. Meanwhile, the 38 readiness criteria that were identified and validated, resided accordingly within each readiness category. The readiness framework as the main outcome of the research can be used to assist the design consultant to identify the readiness gap of the company. The importance lies on informing the area of concern so the effort for BIM implementation can be prioritised. In addition, the individual case study report which had information rich data could help the industry to understand the BIM implementation issue within the context of Malaysia. The outcome of this research showed that the main problems that are preventing consultants from embracing BIM were rarely technical. They were related more to the management and people issues which underpin the capability of the company to successfully implement BIM.

[1]  Aj Marshall-Ponting,et al.  Building information modelling: Literature review on model to determine the level of uptake by the organisation , 2010 .

[2]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[3]  Christine Daymon,et al.  Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications , 2002 .

[4]  Panagiotis Georgakis,et al.  An interactive approach to collaborative 4D construction planning , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[5]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Benefits and lessons learned of implementing building virtual design and construction (VDC) technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems on a large healthcare project , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[6]  R. Raeside,et al.  Research Methods for Graduate Business and Social Science Students , 2007 .

[7]  Angela Lee,et al.  nD modelling: industry uptake considerations , 2007 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[9]  Ray Crotty,et al.  The Impact of Building Information Modelling: Transforming Construction , 2011 .

[10]  Mustafa Alshawi Rethinking IT in Construction and Engineering: Organisational Readiness , 2007 .

[11]  John Henderson and Andrew Croft,et al.  Government Construction Strategy 2011 - Where Are We Now? , 2013 .

[12]  Jan Karlshøj,et al.  Review of the Development andImplementation of IFC compatible BIM , 2008 .

[13]  Angela Lee,et al.  Constructing the Future: nD Modelling , 2006 .

[14]  N. Mack,et al.  Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide. , 2005 .

[15]  Ashraf El-Hamalawi,et al.  An evaluation of current collaborative prototyping practices within the AEC industry , 2006 .

[16]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[17]  John M. Ward,et al.  Managing the Realization of Business Benefits from IT Investments , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[18]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[20]  Arto Kiviniemi,et al.  Engineering-centric BIM , 2008 .

[21]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Parviz F. Rad,et al.  Delays in Construction of Nuclear Power Plants , 1979 .

[23]  Brodie McAdam,et al.  Building information modelling: the UK legal context , 2010 .

[24]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[25]  John M. Ward,et al.  Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[27]  Bonsang Koo,et al.  Feasibility study of 4D CAD in commercial construction , 2002 .

[28]  Mustafa Alshawi,et al.  Web-enabled project management: an emerging paradigm in construction , 2003 .

[29]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Implementation of VR systems: a comparison between the early adoption of CAD and current uptake of VR , 2002 .

[30]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  Towards positive partnering: Revealing the realities in the construction industry , 1997 .

[31]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The IT performance evaluation in the construction industry , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Jahidul Alum,et al.  Construction productivity: Issues encountered by contractors in Singapore , 1995 .

[33]  Brad Hardin,et al.  BIM and Construction Management: Proven Tools, Methods, and Workflows , 2009 .

[34]  Anne-Françoise Cutting-Decelle,et al.  Integration of product and process models as a keystone of concurrent engineering in construction: the ProMICE Project , 1998 .

[35]  Thurasamy Ramayah,et al.  Technology readiness among managers of Malaysian construction firms , 2007 .

[36]  Aj Marshall-Ponting,et al.  An nD modelling approach to improve communication processes for construction , 2005 .

[37]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation , 2001 .

[38]  Michael R. Harwell,et al.  Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquir , 2011 .

[39]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  The Measurement of Computer Attitudes: An Empirical Comparison of Available Scales , 1993 .

[40]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Case studies of BIM adoption for precast concrete design by mid-sized structural engineering firms , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[41]  Lincoln Forbes,et al.  Modern Construction : Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices , 2010 .

[42]  Marjan Sarshar,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach , 2002 .

[43]  C. William Ibbs,et al.  PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS MATURITY (PM)2 MODEL , 2002 .

[44]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[45]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Rethinking construction: the Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol , 2000 .

[46]  Abang Abdullah Abang Ali,et al.  Factors affecting construction labour productivity for Malaysian residential projects , 2005 .

[47]  Angela Lee,et al.  Enhancement of constructability concept: An experience in offsite Malaysia construction industry , 2009 .

[48]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[49]  Kalle Kangas Competency & Capabilities Based Competition and the Role of Information Technology: The Case of Trading by a Finland-based Firm to Russia , 1999 .

[50]  Judith .QBell Judith Bell,et al.  Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-time Researchers , 1993 .

[51]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Collaborative project information management in a semantic web environment , 2008 .

[52]  Eduardo Toledo Santos,et al.  The Competencies of BIM Specialists: a Comparative Analysis of the Literature Review and Job Ad Descriptions , 2011 .

[53]  Joseph D. Langford,et al.  Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development , 2002 .

[54]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[55]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[56]  D Israel,et al.  Research Methods for Graduate Business and Social Science Students , 2007 .

[57]  Yasser Saleh,et al.  An alternative model for measuring the success of IS projects: the GPIS model , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[58]  Oluwole Alfred Olatunji,et al.  A preliminary review on the legal implications of BIM and model ownership , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[59]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Paradigm Trajectories of Building Information Modeling Practice in Project Networks , 2009 .

[60]  Anthony D. Songer,et al.  Resistance to IT change in the AEC industry: an individual assessment tool , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[61]  Kerry London,et al.  Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry , 2010 .

[62]  Umit Isikdag,et al.  Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies , 2009 .

[63]  J. Peppard,et al.  Strategic planning for information systems, Ward and Peppard, 3rd edition , 2007 .

[64]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Concurrent engineering in design-build projects , 1997 .

[65]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[66]  K. Pramod Reddy,et al.  BIM for Building Owners and Developers: Making a Business Case for Using BIM on Projects , 2011 .

[67]  C. S Lim,et al.  Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination , 1999 .

[68]  Stephanie Neath,et al.  Building information modelling in practice: transforming Gatwick airport, UK , 2014 .

[69]  David J. Collis,et al.  Organizational Capability as a Source of Profit , 1996 .

[70]  Dir.,et al.  Corporate profile , 1993, American biotechnology laboratory.

[71]  John Henderson,et al.  Building Information Modelling , 2010 .

[72]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Teaching Building Information Modeling as an Integral Part of Freshman Year Civil Engineering Education , 2010 .

[73]  Mohammed Al-Aghbari,et al.  Factors Affecting Construction Speed of Industrialized Building System in Malaysia , 2005 .

[74]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices , 2013 .

[75]  Kirti Ruikar,et al.  Business process implications of e-commerce in construction organisations , 2006 .

[76]  Willem Kymmell,et al.  Building Information Modeling: Planning and Managing Construction Projects with 4D CAD and Simulations , 2007 .

[77]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Visualisation in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) , 2005 .

[78]  Mike Kagioglou,et al.  Developing a Vision of nD-Enabled Construction , 2003 .

[79]  Ahmad Anuar Othman,et al.  Factors influencing the construction time of civil engineering projects in Malaysia , 2006 .

[80]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Integrating product and process information in the construction sector , 2016 .

[81]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Industrial Case Study of Electronic Design , Cost and Schedule Integration , 1998 .

[82]  Matthew H. Roy,et al.  An investigation of the status of the Malaysian construction industry , 2010 .

[83]  M. Alvesson Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research , 2003 .

[84]  M. Finnemore,et al.  Standardised Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises ( SPICE ) , 1998 .

[85]  G. Klimkó MANAGEMENT AND MATURITY MODELS: BUILDING COMMON UNDERSTANDING , 2001 .

[86]  Jason Underwood,et al.  Going BIM in a commercial world , 2008 .

[87]  David Heesom,et al.  Trends of 4D CAD applications for construction planning , 2004 .

[88]  Ernawati,et al.  The significant factors causing delay of building construction projects in Malaysia , 2007 .

[89]  J. Ward,et al.  Strategic Planning for Information Systems , 1990 .

[90]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Generating, evaluating and visualizing construction schedules with CAD tools , 1998 .

[91]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Concurrent Engineering in the Construction Industry , 1997 .

[92]  Rizal Sebastian,et al.  Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM , 2011 .

[93]  R. Weber Basic content analysis, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[94]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm , 1995 .

[95]  S. Austin,et al.  Never waste a good crisis: a review of progress since Rethinking Construction and thoughts for our future , 2009 .

[96]  Melville Hensey Essential Tools of Total Quality Management , 1993 .

[97]  Oluwole Alfred Olatunji,et al.  Modelling organizations' structural adjustment to BIM adoption: a pilot study on estimating organizations , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[98]  M. Bresnen,et al.  Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas , 2000 .

[99]  Amanda Jane Marshall-Ponting nD modelling as an enabler of inter-disciplinary thinking among construction industry stakeholders , 2006 .

[100]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Development of a readiness assessment model for concurrent engineering in construction , 2001 .

[101]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[102]  Patricia Tzortzopoulos,et al.  The design and implementation of product development process models in construction companies , 2004 .

[103]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[104]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Strategic implementation of IT/IS projects in construction , 2002 .

[105]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  VERDICT—An e-readiness assessment application for construction companies , 2006 .

[106]  Vishal Singh,et al.  Industry perception of BIM adoption in design sector , 2008 .

[107]  Mike Kagioglou Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol: Final Report , 1998 .

[108]  Rob Howard,et al.  Building information modelling - Experts' views on standardisation and industry deployment , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[109]  Ghang Lee,et al.  A Target Benchmark of the Impact of Three-Dimensional Parametric Modeling in Precast Construction , 2005 .

[110]  Dana K. Smith,et al.  Building Information Modeling: A Strategic Implementation Guide for Architects, Engineers, Constructors, and Real Estate Asset Managers , 2009 .

[111]  Rafikul Islam,et al.  Critical success factors of the nine challenges in Malaysia's vision 2020 , 2010 .

[112]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry , 2011 .

[113]  Lyn Richards,et al.  Readme First for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods , 2002 .

[114]  Mike Kagioglou,et al.  Technology adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice , 2011 .

[115]  Aj Marshall-Ponting,et al.  Building information modelling in integrated practice , 2009 .

[116]  Mohd Saleh Jaafar,et al.  Constructability implementation: a survey in the Malaysian construction industry , 2001 .

[117]  Ahmad Tarmizi Haron,et al.  An industrial report on the Malaysian building information modelling (BIM) taskforce : issues and recommendations , 2015 .

[118]  M. N. Saunders,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (4th edn, Vietnamese language edition) , 2011 .

[119]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[120]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[121]  Mohammed Ali Berawi Developing Knowledge Management for Construction Contract Management , 2001 .

[122]  Ao Kiviniemi,et al.  Potential obstacles to use BIM in architectural design , 2009 .

[123]  Oluwole Alfred Olatunji,et al.  Modelling the costs of corporate implementation of building information modelling , 2011 .

[124]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[125]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Management Research: An Introduction , 1991 .

[126]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[127]  A Building Information Modelling Based Production Control System for Construction , 2010 .

[128]  Othman Mohamed,et al.  Delay Mitigation in the Malaysian Construction Industry , 2006 .

[129]  John I. Messner,et al.  Case studies in BIM implementation for programming of healthcare facilities , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[130]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building Information Modelling Maturity Matrix , 2010 .

[131]  Abdul Rashid Abdul Aziz,et al.  A survey of Internet usage in the Malaysian construction industry , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[132]  Murali Sambasivan,et al.  Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry , 2007 .

[133]  G. Aouad,et al.  EVALUATING THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[134]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2014 .

[135]  Song Wu,et al.  nD modelling road map : A vision for nD-Enabled construction , 2005 .

[136]  Norngainy Mohd Tawil,et al.  Cause of construction delay - Theoretical framework , 2011 .