Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework

The problem of updating a structural model and its associated uncertainties by utilizing dynamic response data is addressed using a Bayesian statistical framework that can handle the inherent ill-conditioning and possible nonuniqueness in model updating applications. The objective is not only to give more accurate response predictions for prescribed dynamic loadings but also to provide a quantitative assessment of this accuracy. In the methodology presented, the updated (optimal) models within a chosen class of structural models are the most probable based on the structural data if all the models are equally plausible a priori. The prediction accuracy of the optimal structural models is given by also updating probability models for the prediction error. The precision of the parameter estimates of the optimal structural models, as well as the precision of the optimal prediction-error parameters, can be examined. A large-sample asymptotic expression is given for the updated predictive probability distribution of the uncertain structural response, which is a weighted average of the prediction probability distributions for each optimal model. This predictive distribution can be used to make model predictions despite possible nonuniqueness in the optimal models.

[1]  R. T. Cox The Algebra of Probable Inference , 1962 .

[2]  David Lindley,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint , 1966 .

[3]  P. Eykhoff System Identification Parameter and State Estimation , 1974 .

[4]  J. Chen,et al.  Analytical Model Improvement Using Modal Test Results , 1980 .

[5]  H. Saunders,et al.  Identification of Vibrating Structures , 1982 .

[6]  F. Udwadia Some Nniqueness Results Related to Soil and Building Structural Identification , 1985 .

[7]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[8]  H. G. Natke Updating computational models in the frequency domain based on measured data: a survey , 1988 .

[9]  Morteza A. M. Torkamani,et al.  Stiffness identification of two‐ and three‐dimensional frames , 1988 .

[10]  James T. P. Yao,et al.  Structural safety evaluation based on system identification approaches : proceedings of the Workshop at Lambrecht/Pfalz , 1988 .

[11]  Paul Sas,et al.  Uniqueness aspects of model-updating procedures , 1989 .

[12]  James L. Beck,et al.  Statistical System Identification of Structures , 1989 .

[13]  M. Imregun,et al.  Technical Article: practical articles in shock and vibration technology , 1991 .

[14]  C. P. Fritzen,et al.  Updating of finite element models by means of measured information , 1991 .

[15]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Probabilistic System Identification and Health Monitoring of Structures , 1992 .

[16]  Sharon L. Wood,et al.  Mutual Residual Energy Method for Parameter Estimation in Structures , 1992 .

[17]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A Survey , 1993 .

[18]  Fabrizio Vestroni,et al.  Identification of finite element models in structural dynamics , 1993 .

[19]  James L. Beck,et al.  System Identification Methods Applied to Measured Seismic Response , 1996 .

[20]  J. Beck,et al.  UPDATING MODELS AND THEIR UNCERTAINTIES. II: MODEL IDENTIFIABILITY. TECHNICAL NOTE , 1998 .

[21]  James L. Beck,et al.  Generalized Trajectory Methods for Finding Multiple Extrema and Roots of Functions , 1998 .