Detection and Characterization of Ignitable Liquid Residues in Forensic Fire Debris Samples by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

This study covers an extensive experimental design that was developed for creating simulated fire debris samples under controlled conditions for the detection and identification of ignitable liquids (IL) residues. This design included 19 different substrates, 45 substrate combinations with and without ignitable liquids, and 45 different ILs from three classes (i.e., white spirit, gasoline, and lamp oil). Chemical analysis was performed with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) for improved separation and compound identification. The enhanced peak capacity offered by GC×GC-TOFMS allowed the use of a target compound list in combination with a simple binary decision model to arrive at quite acceptable results with respect to IL detection (89% true positive and 7% false positive rate) and classification (100% correct white spirit, 79% correct gasoline, and 77% correct lamp oil assignment). Although these results were obtained in a limited set of laboratory controlled fire experiments including only three IL classes, this study confirms the conclusions of other studies that GC×GC-TOFMS can be a powerful tool in the challenging task of forensic fire debris analysis.

[1]  Paulina K. Piotrowski,et al.  Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography in forensic science: A critical review of recent trends , 2018, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[2]  Lawrence A. Adutwum,et al.  Total Ion Spectra versus Segmented Total Ion Spectra as Preprocessing Tools for Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry Data , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Leo J.C. Peschier,et al.  Using Alkylate Components for Classifying Gasoline in Fire Debris Samples , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Major chemical compounds in the Ignitable Liquids Reference Collection and Substrate databases , 2017 .

[5]  Soo-Jin Choi,et al.  Fire debris analysis for forensic fire investigation using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy , 2017 .

[6]  M. Sjerps,et al.  Local Ion Signatures (LIS) for the examination of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography applied to fire debris analysis , 2017 .

[7]  P. Schoenmakers,et al.  Towards chemical profiling of ignitable liquids with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: Exploring forensic application to neat white spirits. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[8]  Katie D. Nizio,et al.  Achieving a Near-Theoretical Maximum in Peak Capacity Gain for the Forensic Analysis of Ignitable Liquids Using GC×GC-TOFMS , 2016 .

[9]  C. García-Ruiz,et al.  Analytical tools for the analysis of fire debris. A review: 2008-2015. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[10]  M. Sjerps,et al.  Forensic potential of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography , 2016 .

[11]  J. Hendrikse,et al.  Guidance for Identifying Ignitable Liquids in Fire Debris , 2015 .

[12]  Jack Cochran,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of the halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran contents of residential fire debris using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  Jamie Baerncopf,et al.  A review of modern challenges in fire debris analysis. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[14]  Glen P. Jackson,et al.  Analysis of household ignitable liquids and their post-combustion weathered residues using compound-specific gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[15]  Ying-yu Li,et al.  An Analysis of Background Interference on Fire Debris , 2013 .

[16]  J. M. Rodriguez,et al.  An Arson Investigation by using Comprehensive Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography- Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry , 2012 .

[17]  V. McGuffin,et al.  Effect of evaporation and matrix interferences on the association of simulated ignitable liquid residues to the corresponding liquid standard. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[18]  L. Mondello Fundamental Principles of Comprehensive 2 D GC , 2012 .

[19]  J. Harynuk,et al.  Cluster resolution: a metric for automated, objective and optimized feature selection in chemometric modeling. , 2011, Talanta.

[20]  P Mark L Sandercock,et al.  Fire investigation and ignitable liquid residue analysis--a review: 2001-2007. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[21]  Jeanet Hendrikse,et al.  ENFSI collaborative testing programme for ignitable liquid analysis: a review. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[22]  Alastair D Pert,et al.  Review of Analytical Techniques for Arson Residues , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[23]  G Zadora,et al.  The influence of the type of accelerant, type of burned material, time of burning and availability of air on the possibility of detection of accelerants traces. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[24]  Kenneth G. Furton,et al.  Characterization of background and pyrolysis products that may interfere with the forensic analysis of fire debris , 2004 .

[25]  E. du Pasquier,et al.  Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. 2. Comparison of unevaporated and evaporated automotive gasoline samples. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[26]  E. du Pasquier,et al.  Chemical fingerprinting of unevaporated automotive gasoline samples. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[27]  Richard B. Gaines,et al.  Forensic analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[28]  M. S. Fernandes,et al.  The effect of volatile residues in burnt household items on the detection of fire accelerants , 2002 .

[29]  C. Lennard,et al.  A GC–MS database of target compound chromatograms for the identification of arson accelerants , 1995 .