A comparative assessment of resource efficiency in petroleum refining

Because of increasing environmental and energy security concerns, a detailed understanding of energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the petroleum refining industry is critical for fair and equitable energy and environmental policies. To date, this has proved challenging due in part to the complex nature and variability within refineries. In an effort to simplify energy and emissions refinery analysis, we delineated LP modeling results from 60 large refineries from the US and EU into broad categories based on crude density (API gravity) and heavy product (HP) yields. Product-specific efficiencies and process fuel shares derived from this study were incorporated in Argonne National Laboratory's GREET life-cycle model, along with regional upstream GHG intensities of crude, natural gas and electricity specific to the US and EU regions. The modeling results suggest that refineries that process relatively heavier crude inputs and have lower yields of HPs generally have lower energy efficiencies and higher GHG emissions than refineries that run lighter crudes with lower yields of HPs. The former types of refineries tend to utilize energy-intensive units which are significant consumers of utilities (heat and electricity) and hydrogen. Among the three groups of refineries studied, the major difference in the energy intensitiesmore » is due to the amount of purchased natural gas for utilities and hydrogen, while the sum of refinery feed inputs are generally constant. These results highlight the GHG emissions cost a refiner pays to process deep into the barrel to produce more of the desirable fuels with low carbon to hydrogen ratio. (c) 2015 Argonne National Laboratory. Published by Elsevier Ltd.« less

[1]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[2]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[3]  Michael Wang,et al.  Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products , 2004 .

[4]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[5]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. Kolb,et al.  Analysis of energy use and CO2 emissions in the U.S. refining sector, with projections for 2025. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Jessica P. Abella,et al.  Model to investigate energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications of refining petroleum: impacts of crude quality and refinery configuration. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Larry Bredeson,et al.  Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products , 2010 .

[9]  Amgad Elgowainy,et al.  U.S. refinery efficiency: impacts analysis and implications for fuel carbon policy implementation. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Edgar Furuholt,et al.  Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel , 1995 .

[11]  Amgad Elgowainy,et al.  Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission intensity of petroleum products at U.S. refineries. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.